Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Duty cycle of buck-boost converter

+5
−1

I have the following problem: -

Image alt text

Using Wikipedia I find that during CCM we have the relation: -

$$\frac{V_{out}}{V_{in}} = -\frac{D}{1-D} $$

Solving for $D$ and inserting values gives me

$$D=\frac{20\text{V}}{20\text{V}-24\text{V}} = -5 $$

But this doesn't seem to make sense. First of all, the duty cycle is negative... Second the duty cycle is more than 100%!

Why do I get this erroneous result?

EDIT

Turns out I used the wrong formula. Using the formulas given by my instructor for the course: -

Image alt text

yields $d=0.454545 $

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

What I'm calculating is $$D=\frac{20\text{V}}{-24\text{V}-20\text{V}} = -0.45... $$ (1 comment)

2 answers

+4
−0

Nevermind (for now) what Wikipedia or anyone else says. Stop and actually think about it.

One problem with the question is that is says "buck-boost" but doesn't otherwise define that. A buck-boost converter generally means that the output can be both above or below the input. There are different topologies to achieve that.

Since the question as posed is too vague, I'll answer for a straight buck converter. That's a well defined topology:

In continuous mode with ideal components, the output voltage is the input voltage times the duty cycle. Another way to think about this is that L1 and C1 form a low pass filter. The top end of L1 is switched between Vin and ground, with the only choice being the relative time spent at each. Vout is the averaged result.

You say Vin is 24 V and Vout 20 V. Vout is therefore (20 V)/(24 V) = 83% of Vin. The duty cycle therefore needs to be 83%.

Isn't buck-boost just as well-defined a topolgy as the straight buck or boost converters?

No. As I said, "buck-boost" generally refers to a DC to DC switching power supply which can have its output voltage above or below its input voltage.

There are a number of different ways to achieve that. You could use two switches with a single inductor to make a "DC transformer". You could use capacitive coupling. There are versions that use coupled inductors. Depending on how you define the term, you could even say that using a transformer qualifies as buck-boost, although personally I think that's a stretch.

Show the circuit for your buck-boost, and we can get into more details of how the duty cycle controls the input to output voltage ratio.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

Hi Olin, thanks for your answer. I have edited the question and added some formulas given by my instr... (1 comment)
+4
−0

If you're referring to this Wikipedia page then the topology has a negative output. In that case, the problem as you have it stated in the OP, is misleading: it should be Vo=-20. With that, extracting D will give:

$$D=\dfrac{V_{out}}{V_{out}-V_{in}}=\dfrac{-20}{-20-24}=0.4545$$

Sure enough, a quick check shows the confirmation:

D=0.4545 => Vo=-20

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

Thank you very much for your clear answer. Also, thank you very much for that LT-Spice simulation. I ... (2 comments)

Sign up to answer this question »