Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Comments on Should we have a sub-forum for less structured, forum-style discussions?

Post

Should we have a sub-forum for less structured, forum-style discussions?

+1
−0

I was about to post a question to another music DSP forum about collecting free and open learning materials to a website. I wanted to post such a great idea to a non-ad-supported website, such as Codidact. However, the discussion around, for example, the feasibility of such a website does not follow the Q&A format. So if I wished to write about this idea to e.g. electrical.codidact, then I cannot do this.

Now, if music DSP is not your cup of tea, then the question could be asked about free EE learning materials too.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

Chat (1 comment)
Chat
Lundin‭ wrote 5 days ago

This kind of thing seems more suited for chat. Unfortunately Codidact has no on-site chat (and it isn't likely a priority to implement), but the EE chat over at Stack Exchange is pretty active.