Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on Feedback on 48V power control with reverse polarity and opto latch control

Post

Feedback on 48V power control with reverse polarity and opto latch control

+2
−0

I have designed a two-stage power supply and control power circuit. The design allows the entire system to be powered and controlled using a single external push switch (when pressed, it is shorted to ground and when released the line is open) connected to the Opto Power Enable circuit. The same switch both turns ON the main 48 V rail and later allows the MCU (when ON) to sense user input (for example, to wake up, activate Bluetooth). The 48V input is coming from the battery. The 48V first goes through series of bulk caps connected to the Phase driving MOSFETS and then it comes to logic board.

Initial Power-OFF State

  1. The 48 V input from the battery passes through the slow blow fuse and reverse-polarity MOSFET (Q1) SQ2337ES-T1_BE3 and fuse, but the high-side MOSFET Q7 (FQU12P10) is OFF.

  2. When Q7 is off, no voltage reaches the 48 V -> 12 V DC DC converter, so all downstream supplies (12 V, 5 V, 3.3 V) are also off.

  3. Only a few components remain biased — mainly the optocoupler input (U10) and small bias resistors — so standby current is <1 mA.

User Presses the Power Switch

  1. The LED- is connected to the Switch input which is shorted to ground when switch is pressed and the optocoupler turns on and drives its transistor output low.

  2. This pulls down the collector of QF2 (2N5551) through R78/R79, turning Q7 ON (QF2 is OFF at this time)allowing 48 V to reach the DC-DC converter TEL15-4811N.

At this point, the 12 V, 5 V, and 3.3 V rails start up, and the MCU becomes powered.

Power Keeper

  1. As the 3.3 V rail rises, the MCU and the logic circuit (U9/U4) are powered.

  2. The User will keep the switch pressed until MCU takes control (100ms time approx)

  3. The latch is maintained from the MCU control logic which turns ON the QF2. The switch can be released, and the 48 V supply stays ON continuously

MCU-Controlled Power-Off (Power Kill)

  1. In Idle state to save power, the MCU asserts PWR_KILL_SIG_A/B to logic gates (U9 and U4).

  2. The AND-gate output then drives QF2 base low, turning QF2 OFF.

  3. With QF2 off, Q7 gate rises to 48 V via pull-ups (R78/R79), and Q7 turns OFF.

  4. The 48 V line to the DC-DC converters is cut, removing all secondary supplies and fully shutting down the system.

  5. The standby current returns to microamp levels, leaving only the optocoupler input bias active.

Questions for review

  1. Is the P-MOSFET-based reverse polarity protection design good?, or should I use two back to back P-MOSFET for reverse current blocking ?

  2. For surge handling, is SMBJ58A (58V) appropriate for 48V nominal?

  3. Is the optocoupler latch (LTV-357T) stable and low-leakage, or is there a better MOSFET-based approach?

  4. Do I need to add a self latch circuit to keep the Q7 turn on even before MCU takes over the control ?

Any suggestions to further reduce standby current and improve overall robustness from ESD, Short Circuit and Overvoltage?

Scheamtic

History

1 comment thread

What's the optocoupler there for? (1 comment)
What's the optocoupler there for?
Lundin‭ wrote 11 months ago

Why is there an optocoupler there since you use same ground on primary and secondary? As designed, it just acts as dysfunctional, slow, non-isolated BJT. Regarding the reverse polarity protection you need to ensure that GND is only coming from one single place like a connector, or otherwise the current will take unexpected paths upon reverse polarity and fry random parts. So the GND plane needs to be reviewed, as well as your plans of chassis grounding with regards to EMC. What are the general EMC requirements - industrial? Automotive?