Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on Transformer - Vsec or Current rating parameter

Parent

Transformer - Vsec or Current rating parameter

+2
−0

I am looking at the datasheet of the 7508170315(link) transformer and something seems strange to me. Itable from datasheet

If I connect this to a 12V supply and expose it to 10us pulse: 12V*10us/475uH = 252mA which is apparently less than the 350mAAC - is it actually? What 350mAAC mean in this case?

However, this is clearly violating the 11Vus spec(12V*10us=120Vus) which will certainly saturate the transformer core.

Which parameter should I look at here?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+2
−0

If I connect this to a 12V supply and expose it to 10us pulse: 12V*10us/475uH = 252mA

$$$$ This current flows in the primary magnetization inductance (475 μH) after applying 12 volts for 10 μs. This causes core saturation based on the volt-second figure limit of 11 volt-μs.

$$\dfrac{V\cdot dt}{L} = dI$$

$$$$ I believe when the data sheet states the 475 μH figure, it relates to primary inductance despite them calling it $L_S$. If you have any doubts about this, then contact WURTH electronics for clarification. It does look like an error because primary inductance is the driven winding and it is solely responsible for core saturation.
$$$$ The 350 mA AC figure relates to load currents - this is unrelated to the magnetization current. Load current doesn't cause magnetization hence it can't create core saturation. This is because load current primary ampere-turns are cancelled entirely by load current secondary ampere-turns. $$$$ 350 mA RMS is the primary load current limit and, given that the transformer steps down voltage by 2:1, the secondary load current limit is 700 mA RMS.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

General comments (4 comments)
General comments
2kind‭ wrote almost 4 years ago

Thanks, Andy! How does this current limit of 700mA RMS apply on a secondary when potential capacitor there acts as a "short" during the first pulse? If we assume pulse not exceeding 11Vus.

Andy aka‭ wrote almost 4 years ago

@2kind - What capacitor? What pulse? I know nothing about your target circuit and, to answer your question, I didn't need that information.

2kind‭ wrote almost 4 years ago

If we assume there is a forward based diode followed by a cap to GND on secondary.

Andy aka‭ wrote almost 4 years ago

@2kind - if that is all you have on your secondary then the 700 mA applies when charging the capacitor. But, bear in mind that I don't want you responding with another variant of what load might be connected for me to have to make another comment because where would this process stop?