Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on Why 3.3V instead of 3V?

Post

Why 3.3V instead of 3V?

+10
−0

Usual values used in doing electronics/power supplies are almost always round numbers:

  • 5V
  • 12V
  • 28V
  • 48V
  • 60V

I understand that in some cases ICs are built to accept the voltage directly coming from the lithium-ion cell in order to simplify the power stage, therefore, having 4.2V input.

But, what is the reason behind having a 3.3V voltage level omnipresent instead of 3V?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (6 comments)
General comments
Andy aka‭ wrote almost 4 years ago · edited almost 4 years ago

24 volts is probably used more often than 28 volts and quite possibly 72 volts is more common than 60 volts. 15 volts is also commonly used.

2kind‭ wrote almost 4 years ago · edited almost 4 years ago

I've been using 72V extensively and found that 60V was more common simply because it's in the "Low Voltage" category. It was battery-powered, though. Still, why 3.3V and not 3V? Most(every?) of the IC's accepting 3.3V could accept 3V so I assumed there is some historic reason behind the 3.3 value.

Nick Alexeev‭ wrote almost 4 years ago

We could also add 1.8V and 2.5V to the question.

Olin Lathrop‭ wrote almost 4 years ago

It's a number somebody picked from a whole set of tradeoffs. Note that 3.3 V is just about 2/3 of 5 V.

2kind‭ wrote almost 4 years ago

Everyone's right in one way. There is no way to close the question other than deleting it so I will leave it here unanswered.

leroy105‭ wrote over 3 years ago

Actually I think this is a really good question. It's kind of more historical though I guess (and I don't know the answer either).