Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Comments on Can a paper be a tutorial or textbook-like?

Parent

Can a paper be a tutorial or textbook-like?

+3
−0

Although I joined Codidact from the beginning, I was never truly active and lost track of the development of the system and this site in particular.

I've read the help and the "paper" category looks interesting (it seems to address some of the suggestions I made in the very early brainstorming days of Codidact, e.g. a sort of "blog" space for authors).

Reading the help about papers it seems that the feature is meant for "paper-like" content, i.e. somewhat innovative content, but maybe I didn't get the whole picture.

Since the first bullet there is about "education", I wonder whether writing some tutorial/textbook-like material would be on-topic. Moreover I'd like to know if the level of the material need to be "high" (e.g. post-degree) or can also be lower (e.g. high-school or undergraduate).

It goes without saying that it must be quality content, so I'm not asking about that. But my doubt is about the "innovation" thing. In fact, for example, I was considering writing a paper on what is a lumped parameter circuits and why/when it is useful. So no real innovation here (besides probably my writing style).

Is this acceptable on this site? When I joined Codidact I envisioned it also as a place where experts could put high-quality introductory material for newbies and students. Is the "paper" category such a place?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+3
−0

This is a good question. I wasn't originally envisioning introductions to known concepts, but that might work if well written. If so, the Paper should at least be clearly labeled as such. We don't have a lot of Papers, and I wouldn't want to see introductory material drowning out new concepts. I suppose if that happens we could create a new Tutorial category and migrate the tutorial-type Papers over there.

Another possibility is to write the tutorial as an answer to a carefully asked question. Self-answered questions are fine here, and can be used for tutorial-like answers. For example, I did something like that here.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

I think your idea of creating another category is the way to go long term. Textbook-like material doe... (1 comment)
I think your idea of creating another category is the way to go long term. Textbook-like material doe...
Lorenzo Donati‭ wrote over 3 years ago

I think your idea of creating another category is the way to go long term. Textbook-like material doesn't lend itself too well to be put in Q+A form, IMO, and the Q would be really artificial most of the times. And a waste of time to get right, since the essence of the thing lies entirely in the answer.

I like the idea of creating papers and then, if the need arise, migrate them to a new category. Maybe using a new tag like textbook-content or tutorial would help a later migration.