Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on What is the difference between emitter and collector of a transistor?

Parent

What is the difference between emitter and collector of a transistor?

+4
−0

In all descriptions of how (non-FET) transistors work I've seen, there is an inherent symmetry: There's either an n-doped layer between two p-doped, or a p-doped between two n-doped, and the description does not make any distinction between the two outer layers.

On the other hand, one of the connections to the outer layers is called emitter and the other collector. Also, in the transistor symbol in circuits, the difference is clearly marked by an arrow. Therefore I assume there actually is a difference.

Therefore I wonder: What is the difference between emitter and collector? What would happen if you would insert a transistor reversed?

Note: I'm physicist (so I can understand advanced descriptions on the physics level), but I don't have any experience with electronics.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+3
−0

I see you already have an answer based on the device physics. I'll answer that this means in a circuit.

BJT (bipolar junction transistors) do work in reverse, at least somewhat. Generally, the characteristics aren't as good, particularly the gain. However, in most cases you still get some gain with the collector and emitter swapped.

I've actually had circuits where I accidentally installed a transistor backwards, and they worked. In that case, the circuit was tolerant of the lower gain. Circuits that require closer to the minimum guaranteed gain probably wouldn't work.

How a BJT works in reverse also depends on its geometry. Planar construction, like that shown by Joel Reyes Noche, doesn't work so well in reverse. That is because it is well optimized for charges in the base to make their way to the collector. Remember that the gain is the reciprocal of those that don't make it to the collector (go to the emitter instead). If you were to flip the collector and emitter, you can visualize how the system would be less efficient, meaning not quite such a large fraction of charges in the base would make it to the collector.

In a more simple NPN or PNP sandwich, reversing the transistor won't matter as much.


I naively assumed that all transistors of the same type have essentially identical characteristics; after all, unlike for other components, there seem to be no numbers written for them on circuit diagrams.

I'm not sure what you mean by "type". NPN versus PNP, or more specific, like 2N3906 versus 2N4401. In any case, there are many many individual models of transistors. These vary between each other in gain, maximum C-E voltage, maximum C current, highest usable frequency, power dissipation capability, pinout, package, and other parameters.

Any decent schematic absolutely will show the particular transistor model, or it will be accompanied by a BOM (bill of materials) that does. Such things must be specified to be able to build the unit.

Schematics that are only intended to conceptually show a circuit, like what may be posted here on this Q&A platform, might not always specify a particular model when that's not relevant to the concept. You can't build something like that, though, without somehow picking a model for each transistor.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

Thank you for the answer. Up to now I naively assumed that all transistors of the same type have esse... (1 comment)
Thank you for the answer. Up to now I naively assumed that all transistors of the same type have esse...
celtschk‭ wrote about 3 years ago

Thank you for the answer. Up to now I naively assumed that all transistors of the same type have essentially identical characteristics; after all, unlike for other components, there seem to be no numbers written for them on circuit diagrams.