Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on Capacitance of inductor

Parent

Capacitance of inductor

+0
−2

What is a typical value for capacitance of a real inductor? Does this internal capacitance exist only under AC and not DC?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+3
−0
What is a typical value for capacitance of a real inductor?

"Typical" capacitance is a useless to design circuits with. It will also vary considerably by inductor size, geometry, and materials used.

The only real answer is in the datasheet of whatever inductor you are considering using. There is no substitute for reading the datasheet. If the datasheet doesn't tell you the equivalent parallel capacitance, or the self-resonance frequency, then you can't use that inductor in serious applications. Take a look at datasheets from reputable inductor manufacturers (CoilCraft, Würth, etc), and you will see such specifications.

Does this internal capacitance exist only under AC and not DC?

Stop and actually think about it. The capacitance is a function of the geometry and materials. A certain amount of charge is stored per volt, which is the definition of capacitance. When you buy capacitors, do their values change depending on whether you use them with AC or DC voltage applied?

Real capacitors aren't ideal, so they only act like capacitors up to some frequency range. Still, that doesn't seem to be what you are asking about. Some ceramic capacitors exhibit reduced capacitance (less charge stored for the same voltage increment) at high voltages, but that also doesn't seem to be what you are asking about.

A 100 pF capacitor is 100 pF, whether it's sitting in a box, has DC voltage applied to it, or 10 Hz AC applied to it, assuming maximum voltage specs aren't exceeded. The parasitic capacitance of an inductor is going to be quite constant, probably to past the self-resonance frequency of the whole inductor.

It seems you are confusing a capacitance with its impedance. The impedance magnitude of a capacitor does depend on frequency, being inversely proportional to that frequency.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

The end is near (4 comments)
The end is near
Kranulis‭ wrote about 3 years ago

So you scare away users that put in way more effort into their questions, yet give elaborate answers to these half-baked two liner shitcakes. For the better part of the last month some student has been blatantly posting his homework garbage with 0 effort shown, which has been the ONLY content on this site. So I guess if you don't answer, then this forum is done for real.

Olin Lathrop‭ wrote about 3 years ago · edited about 3 years ago

@Kran: Yeah, these questions have been pretty lazy. I haven't been upvoting the lazy ones, and sometimes downvoting. We want to help students, but we also aren't here to read the datasheet to people. At this point in the life of this site, I'm being more tolerant and using these questions as a way to build content with good answers. If the site were more mature, we could be more ruthless. Hopefully that day will come. It's a tough balance. Close too much too early, and you get no content. Leave too much drivel, and you scare off those that might provide good content.

As for scaring off users that put more effort into their questions, I don't know what you are referring to. Very few question have been closed in the history of this site. We've been quite tolerant. Once we get more traffic, we can raise our standards to what they should be.

Kranulis‭ wrote about 3 years ago · edited about 3 years ago

Olin Lathrop‭ Closing questions is hardly the issue here. The problem is the recipe for answering questions half of the time:

Explain to the user why his/her question is unclear/stupid/obvious, then answer anyway, then some borderline rude comments on how to improve next time.

Notice how you provide most of the answers here - Your attitude and style matter a lot. Meanwhile there is Sphero, Andy, Voltage Spike & Co on ee.stack who don't belittle everyone in answers and still provide great value. How is codidact going to compete and be a 'better' version if you don't change your approach to people? Answer is it won't. People won't post because nobody wants to read that he/she is stupid on half of the questions they ask.

ee.stack has a lot of garbage, but it has not scared off good content providers. Tony gets banned now and then for running his mouth, but not much more than that. Seriously, if you don' t become more tolerant towards people, this project will die.

Olin Lathrop‭ wrote about 3 years ago

@Kran: Some questions are stupid. The OP isn't going to change without some reaction to that. In any case, if you think a question isn't answered well, write your own answer. We could use more good answers here, in addition to more questions. This site won't go anywhere if one person does most of the answering.