Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on How to design a low-pass filter when certain conditions must be met

Post

How to design a low-pass filter when certain conditions must be met

+0
−2

I am designing a low-pass filter with cut-off frequency = 100Hz and after the cutoff frequency from -3dB to -10dB the average decrease in db/Hz = -0.1 db/Hz.I know how to design a low-pass filter with cut-off frequency of 100Hz however I cannot meet the 2nd condition of the filter.How do I achieve such a thing?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

Let me try to "translate" your requirements: * Lowpass (no order specified) with -3dB at fo=100 Hz ... (1 comment)
Let me try to "translate" your requirements: * Lowpass (no order specified) with -3dB at fo=100 Hz ...
LvW‭ wrote almost 2 years ago · edited almost 2 years ago

Let me try to "translate" your requirements:

Lowpass (no order specified) with -3dB at fo=100 Hz

A frequency increase beyond this frequency fo by another 100Hz (fx1=200 Hz) must correspond to a damping of -10dB (because of 0.1dB/Hz).

A first-order lowpass (fo=100 Hz) has a damping of -10 dB at fx2=300 Hz.

Therefore, when a 10 dB damping is reqired at Fx1=200 Hz, the order of the filter must be increased.

Comment: Since you have mentioned an "average" damping, I have assumed that you do not require an exact "damping function" of 0.1dB/Hz