Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on Power amplifier for remote controller

Post

Power amplifier for remote controller

+3
−1

I'm designing remote controller based on NRF24L01 and STM32. I want to use SMA antenna. My question is regarding power amplifier (PA). When is it necessary to use one? The range I'm aiming for is 20+ meters. Every commercially available module with NRF24 and SMA antenna has PA, but I would like to save on cost and space on PCB. The NRF24 datasheet says that recommended load impedance is 50 Ω. Is it therefore possible to use SMA connector and antenna with 50 Ω impedance?

EDIT:

Is there a way to calculate the approximate range of this remote controller? I have seen some advanced software that can simulate antennas (too advanced for me), but I want to know what will be the approximate range. Or is it just easier to test this and then add PA later on if it is necessary.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

Fading losses depend on channel path integrity. (1 comment)
Fading losses depend on channel path integrity.
TonyStewart‭ wrote about 2 years ago

The ideal conditions are almost never achieved in ordinary ground communications, due to obstructions, reflections from buildings, and most importantly reflections from the ground out of phase. This fading can cancel up to all of the signal. So it is more important you define the path and all reflective surfaces and the intended use. Much gain can be obtained by aiming a narrow band expensive antenna and avoiding nulls. You have adequate signal power for 50m but unless you control all the paths emitted and reflected, you will have no control on the received signal integrity with the possibility of all the signal at some positions being totally lost. There are tricks to improving range such as lowest data rate, and better Lithium batteries, and more with antenna aperture shaping. You can expect performance as good as an average bluetooth modules. Don't expect 20 dB fading unless you know that 40 dB fading exists too and the lower the signal, the greater Ricean Fading.