Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on What type of button is this on a remote control

Parent

What type of button is this on a remote control

+2
−0

The remote control of my TV has two kinds of buttons. There are "normal" ones for the digits etc. which work by bringing a conductive material on the underside of the button in contact with the board of the remote control to establish contact.

And then there are these round silver buttons in the centre for the remote. One pushes their curved surface down to bring it into contact with, presumably, a contact below (not visible from the outside).

Photo of the board of the remote control. In the centre are 9 round silver buttons

How is this later type of button called? I don't need a specific part name or number, just a general category name would be helpful.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+1
−0

It is interesting to see how they deposited these carbon electrodes over solder mask and copper traces both under the button foil switches and membrane switches alike which offer more tactile feel. Both offer capacitance changes to non-conductive switches. The membrane switches are mounted on their own clear insulator laminate.

All sensors are configured in a matrix for typical scanning mode typically by a single IC interfaced to a low-budget uC.

The advantage of capacitance switches are better reliability and silent operation except for the sealed membranes which give better tactile feel. Using an audio range signal the sensor IC easily detect the reflection of signals when the gap is reduced < 1mm with programmable sensitivity.

How they chose the need for tactile membranes over the printed fingers must have been based on the frequency of fast operations to reduce false negative operations with the benefit of tactile response.

Image_alt_text

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

Not necessarily capacitive switches. (2 comments)
Not necessarily capacitive switches.
Olin Lathrop‭ wrote 3 months ago

You are assuming the domed buttons are capacitive switches. Maybe they are, but I wouldn't rule out that they are simple mechanical contacts. In all the products I've worked on that had these kinds of domed buttons, they were just switches. The on-resistance was up to about 200 Ω or so. I connected them between ground and a microcontroller pin with internal weak pullup, with debouncing in the firmware.

TonyStewart‭ wrote 3 months ago · edited 3 months ago

My assumptions were based on analyzing the photo of the transparent substrate that the membrane switches were bonded to without any conductive traces. Yet on the same side below them was the carbon printed traces connecting the domed membranes beneath the clear substrate. It is true that membrane switches can be conductive but in this case I see no tracks. Perhaps they were if the clear substrate has holes under them to make contact.

I could be wrong, but then maybe not. https://dgniceonetech.medium.com/features-and-advantages-of-capacitive-membrane-switches-db1933d1f74b

It's hard to analyze a 3D layout on a 2D photo.