Post History
The worst case won't get any better, whether series, parallel, or some other combination. The result of two 1 kΩ ±5% resistors in series is a 2 kΩ ±5% resistor. The probability that the result is ...
Answer
#2: Post edited
- <p>The worst case won't get any better, whether series, parallel, or some
- other combination. The result of two 1 kΩ ±5% resistors in
- series is a 2 kΩ ±5% resistor.
- <p>The probability that the result is closer to the middle gets better
- with multiple resistors, but only if each resistor is random within its
- range, which includes that it is independent of the others. This is not
- the case if they are from the same reel, or possibly even from the same
- manufacturer within some time window.
- <p>The manufacturer's selection process may also make the error
- non-random. For example, if they make resistors with a wide variance, then
- pick the ones that fall within 1% and sell them as 1% parts, then sell the
- remaining ones as 5% parts, the 5% parts will have a double-hump
- distribution with no values being within 1%.
- <p>Because you can't know the error distribution within the worst case
- error window, and because even if you did, the worst case stays the same,
doing what you are suggesting is not useful to electronic design. If youspecify 5% resistors, then the design must work correctly with anyresistance within the ±5% range.
- <p>The worst case won't get any better, whether series, parallel, or some
- other combination. The result of two 1 kΩ ±5% resistors in
- series is a 2 kΩ ±5% resistor.
- <p>The probability that the result is closer to the middle gets better
- with multiple resistors, but only if each resistor is random within its
- range, which includes that it is independent of the others. This is not
- the case if they are from the same reel, or possibly even from the same
- manufacturer within some time window.
- <p>The manufacturer's selection process may also make the error
- non-random. For example, if they make resistors with a wide variance, then
- pick the ones that fall within 1% and sell them as 1% parts, then sell the
- remaining ones as 5% parts, the 5% parts will have a double-hump
- distribution with no values being within 1%.
- <p>Because you can't know the error distribution within the worst case
- error window, and because even if you did, the worst case stays the same,
- doing what you are suggesting is not useful to electronic design.
#1: Initial revision
<p>The worst case won't get any better, whether series, parallel, or some other combination. The result of two 1 kΩ ±5% resistors in series is a 2 kΩ ±5% resistor. <p>The probability that the result is closer to the middle gets better with multiple resistors, but only if each resistor is random within its range, which includes that it is independent of the others. This is not the case if they are from the same reel, or possibly even from the same manufacturer within some time window. <p>The manufacturer's selection process may also make the error non-random. For example, if they make resistors with a wide variance, then pick the ones that fall within 1% and sell them as 1% parts, then sell the remaining ones as 5% parts, the 5% parts will have a double-hump distribution with no values being within 1%. <p>Because you can't know the error distribution within the worst case error window, and because even if you did, the worst case stays the same, doing what you are suggesting is not useful to electronic design. If you specify 5% resistors, then the design must work correctly with any resistance within the ±5% range.