Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

66%
+2 −0
Q&A More accuracy from multiple resistors in series or parallel?

The worst case won't get any better, whether series, parallel, or some other combination. The result of two 1 kΩ ±5% resistors in series is a 2 kΩ ±5% resistor. The probability that the result is ...

posted 4y ago by Olin Lathrop‭  ·  edited 4y ago by Olin Lathrop‭

Answer
#2: Post edited by user avatar Olin Lathrop‭ · 2020-10-21T21:20:20Z (about 4 years ago)
  • <p>The worst case won't get any better, whether series, parallel, or some
  • other combination. The result of two 1 k&Omega; &plusmn;5% resistors in
  • series is a 2 k&Omega; &plusmn;5% resistor.
  • <p>The probability that the result is closer to the middle gets better
  • with multiple resistors, but only if each resistor is random within its
  • range, which includes that it is independent of the others. This is not
  • the case if they are from the same reel, or possibly even from the same
  • manufacturer within some time window.
  • <p>The manufacturer's selection process may also make the error
  • non-random. For example, if they make resistors with a wide variance, then
  • pick the ones that fall within 1% and sell them as 1% parts, then sell the
  • remaining ones as 5% parts, the 5% parts will have a double-hump
  • distribution with no values being within 1%.
  • <p>Because you can't know the error distribution within the worst case
  • error window, and because even if you did, the worst case stays the same,
  • doing what you are suggesting is not useful to electronic design. If you
  • specify 5% resistors, then the design must work correctly with any
  • resistance within the &plusmn;5% range.
  • <p>The worst case won't get any better, whether series, parallel, or some
  • other combination. The result of two 1 k&Omega; &plusmn;5% resistors in
  • series is a 2 k&Omega; &plusmn;5% resistor.
  • <p>The probability that the result is closer to the middle gets better
  • with multiple resistors, but only if each resistor is random within its
  • range, which includes that it is independent of the others. This is not
  • the case if they are from the same reel, or possibly even from the same
  • manufacturer within some time window.
  • <p>The manufacturer's selection process may also make the error
  • non-random. For example, if they make resistors with a wide variance, then
  • pick the ones that fall within 1% and sell them as 1% parts, then sell the
  • remaining ones as 5% parts, the 5% parts will have a double-hump
  • distribution with no values being within 1%.
  • <p>Because you can't know the error distribution within the worst case
  • error window, and because even if you did, the worst case stays the same,
  • doing what you are suggesting is not useful to electronic design.
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Olin Lathrop‭ · 2020-10-21T21:16:44Z (about 4 years ago)
<p>The worst case won't get any better, whether series, parallel, or some
other combination.  The result of two 1 k&Omega; &plusmn;5% resistors in
series is a 2 k&Omega; &plusmn;5% resistor.

<p>The probability that the result is closer to the middle gets better
with multiple resistors, but only if each resistor is random within its
range, which includes that it is independent of the others. This is not
the case if they are from the same reel, or possibly even from the same
manufacturer within some time window.

<p>The manufacturer's selection process may also make the error
non-random. For example, if they make resistors with a wide variance, then
pick the ones that fall within 1% and sell them as 1% parts, then sell the
remaining ones as 5% parts, the 5% parts will have a double-hump
distribution with no values being within 1%.

<p>Because you can't know the error distribution within the worst case
error window, and because even if you did, the worst case stays the same,
doing what you are suggesting is not useful to electronic design. If you
specify 5% resistors, then the design must work correctly with any
resistance within the &plusmn;5% range.