Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Post History

66%
+2 −0
Meta Creating an additional "user"

Personally I'd rather have everyone use their real name and affiliation. That basically puts their reputation out there on anything they say. If you really believe in something, have the guts to ...

posted 4y ago by Olin Lathrop‭

Answer
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Olin Lathrop‭ · 2020-11-17T13:57:15Z (almost 4 years ago)
Personally I'd rather have everyone use their real name and affiliation.  That basically puts their reputation out there on anything they say.  If you really believe in something, have the guts to say so.  If you don't, then I don't want to hear it.

However, that's not the policy of the site.  I wouldn't have a problem with someone having multiple accounts as long as they are never used to vote on each other's posts.  This would have to be enforced by the software, so the multiple accounts need to be known deep down in some database along with other private personal information.

I don't know whether Codidact has such a feature.  If it does, then go ahead and create a second account.  If not, then this would be a good discussion for Codidact meta.