Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

60%
+1 −0
Q&A Is there a way to reliably measure antenna return loss outside a lab?

It sounds like you are doing the measurements right. However, I expect the problem is in the space around the antenna. At 434 MHz, the wavelength is 690 mm or 27 inches. Everything out to about ...

posted 3y ago by Olin Lathrop‭

Answer
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Olin Lathrop‭ · 2021-05-31T19:24:37Z (over 3 years ago)
It sounds like you are doing the measurements right.  However, I expect the problem is in the space around the antenna.

At 434 MHz, the wavelength is 690 mm or 27 inches.  Everything out to about a meter or 1&frac12; m should be considered near field, and can effect the antenna directly.  This includes whatever table it is sitting on.  Even with a table that's transparent to RF, it needs to be a meter or more above the floor.  Usually dry light wood is a good material for such a table.

Even then the surroundings can still matter.  If there is something near by, like a flat piece of metal, that reflects the radio waves, it can still matter even if it's out of the near field.  This is because the reflection has a fixed phase offset from the transmitted signal.

If you have access to an anechoic chamber, try your tests there to see if they become more repeatable.  If so, then you know your environment is the problem.

If you don't have access to an anechoic chamber, try an open field test.  See if you can suspend the antenna several meters above the ground.  If possible, put some RF-absorbing material on the ground below the antenna.  Failing that, move the antenna up higher so that the reflection off the ground is more attenuated.

Local transmission, especially at ISM frequencies, are probably not much of an issue.  The signal you are feeding the antenna should be many many times larger than anything the antenna might pick up from elsewhere.