Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Post History

50%
+4 −4
Meta How to treat data communication questions?

I think these kind of abstract/big picture data communication questions should be on-topic here. Such as the mentioned question about the OSI model. I've been actively pushing for software.codidac...

posted 2y ago by Lundin‭

Answer
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Lundin‭ · 2021-12-08T14:12:04Z (over 2 years ago)
I think these kind of abstract/big picture data communication questions should be on-topic here. Such as the mentioned question about the OSI model.

I've been actively pushing for software.codidact.com not to accept embedded systems questions and refer such questions to this site instead, so that we don't end up with the same unfortunate overlap that SE had. 

This initiative has so far been well-received and so embedded systems questions are currently listed as off-topic on software.codidact.com. And data communication is rather intimately connected with embedded systems, so it would be awkward not to accept such questions here, as long as they have some design or engineering aspect.

Things like network administration and Internet Protocol Suite application tiers probably don't belong here though. They are more suited for either powerusers.codidact.com or software.codidact.com.