Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

66%
+2 −0
Q&A What reactance actually is?

"React" implies a response to an "event". For an inductor, the "event" is a change in current, $\frac{di}{dt}$ For a capacitor, the "event" is a change in voltage, $\frac{dv}{dt}$ $$$$ So, ...

posted 2y ago by Andy aka‭  ·  edited 2y ago by Andy aka‭

Answer
#16: Post edited by user avatar Andy aka‭ · 2022-05-04T11:04:50Z (almost 2 years ago)
  • "React" implies a response to an event. The event is a change in current, \$\frac{di}{dt}\$ for an inductor and, for a capacitor, the event is a change in voltage, \$\frac{dv}{dt}\$.
  • $$$$
  • So, an inductor or capacitor will produce a proportional reaction (or response) to something changing. If we say that a capacitor **responds** to a change in voltage, we then have to define that **response** and, the only thing it **can do** is alter its current. Therefore we can say that the transfer function of a capacitor is: its response current (\$i\$) divided by its input (\$\frac{dv}{dt}\$) or this: -
  • $$\dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}} = \dfrac{\text{A current is produced}}{\text{For a change in voltage}}$$
  • And we call that transfer function, (unsurprisingly) capacitance. Rearranging we get this: -
  • $$C = \dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}\hspace{1cm} \text{ or}\hspace{1cm} i = C\cdot\dfrac{dv}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard capacitance formula}$$
  • For an inductor, the reactive output is voltage and, if we went through the same procedure as we did for a capacitor, we would find that: -
  • $$v = L\cdot\dfrac{di}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard inductance formula}$$
  • "React" implies a response to an "event".
  • - For an inductor, the "event" is a change in current, \$\frac{di}{dt}\$
  • - For a capacitor, the "event" is a change in voltage, \$\frac{dv}{dt}\$
  • $$$$
  • So, an inductor or capacitor will produce a proportional reaction (or response) to something changing. If we say that a capacitor **responds** to a change in voltage, we then have to define that **response** and, the only thing it **can do** is alter its current. Therefore we can say that the transfer function of a capacitor is: its response current (\$i\$) divided by its input (\$\frac{dv}{dt}\$) or this: -
  • $$\dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}} = \dfrac{\text{A current is produced}}{\text{For a change in voltage}}$$
  • And we call that transfer function, (unsurprisingly) capacitance. Rearranging we get this: -
  • $$C = \dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}\hspace{1cm} \text{ or}\hspace{1cm} i = C\cdot\dfrac{dv}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard capacitance formula}$$
  • For an inductor, the reactive output is voltage and, if we went through the same procedure as we did for a capacitor, we would find that: -
  • $$v = L\cdot\dfrac{di}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard inductance formula}$$
#15: Post edited by user avatar Andy aka‭ · 2022-05-03T12:10:30Z (almost 2 years ago)
  • "React" implies a response to an event. The event is a change in current, \$\frac{di}{dt}\$ for an inductor and, for a capacitor, the event is a change in voltage, \$\frac{dv}{dt}\$.
  • $$$$
  • So, an inductor or capacitor will produce a rate-proportional reaction (or response) to something changing. If we say that a capacitor **responds** to a change in voltage, we then have to define that **response** and, the only thing it **can do** is alter its current. Therefore we can say that the transfer function of a capacitor is: its response current (\$i\$) divided by its input (\$\frac{dv}{dt}\$) or this: -
  • $$\dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}} = \dfrac{\text{A current is produced}}{\text{For a change in voltage}}$$
  • And we call that transfer function, (unsurprisingly) capacitance. Rearranging we get this: -
  • $$C = \dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}\hspace{1cm} \text{ or}\hspace{1cm} i = C\cdot\dfrac{dv}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard capacitance formula}$$
  • For an inductor, the reactive output is voltage and, if we went through the same procedure as we did for a capacitor, we would find that: -
  • $$v = L\cdot\dfrac{di}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard inductance formula}$$
  • "React" implies a response to an event. The event is a change in current, \$\frac{di}{dt}\$ for an inductor and, for a capacitor, the event is a change in voltage, \$\frac{dv}{dt}\$.
  • $$$$
  • So, an inductor or capacitor will produce a proportional reaction (or response) to something changing. If we say that a capacitor **responds** to a change in voltage, we then have to define that **response** and, the only thing it **can do** is alter its current. Therefore we can say that the transfer function of a capacitor is: its response current (\$i\$) divided by its input (\$\frac{dv}{dt}\$) or this: -
  • $$\dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}} = \dfrac{\text{A current is produced}}{\text{For a change in voltage}}$$
  • And we call that transfer function, (unsurprisingly) capacitance. Rearranging we get this: -
  • $$C = \dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}\hspace{1cm} \text{ or}\hspace{1cm} i = C\cdot\dfrac{dv}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard capacitance formula}$$
  • For an inductor, the reactive output is voltage and, if we went through the same procedure as we did for a capacitor, we would find that: -
  • $$v = L\cdot\dfrac{di}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard inductance formula}$$
#14: Post edited by user avatar Andy aka‭ · 2022-05-03T12:09:56Z (almost 2 years ago)
  • The word "react" implies that something responds to an event. For an inductor, the event is a change in current, \$\frac{di}{dt}\$ and, for a capacitor, the "event" is a change in voltage, \$\frac{dv}{dt}\$.
  • $$$$
  • So, an inductor or capacitor will produce a proportional reaction (or response) to something changing at a fixed rate.
  • $$$$
  • If we say that a capacitor **responds** to a change in voltage, we then have to define that **response** and, the only thing it **can do** is alter its current. Therefore we can say that the transfer function of a capacitor is: its response current (\$i\$) divided by its input (\$\frac{dv}{dt}\$) or this: -
  • $$\dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}} = \dfrac{\text{A current is produced}}{\text{For a change in voltage}}$$
  • And we call that transfer function, (unsurprisingly) capacitance. Rearranging we get this: -
  • $$C = \dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}\hspace{1cm} \text{ or}\hspace{1cm} i = C\cdot\dfrac{dv}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard capacitance formula}$$
  • For an inductor, the reactive output is voltage and, if we went through the same procedure as we did for a capacitor, we would find that: -
  • $$v = L\cdot\dfrac{di}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard inductance formula}$$
  • "React" implies a response to an event. The event is a change in current, \$\frac{di}{dt}\$ for an inductor and, for a capacitor, the event is a change in voltage, \$\frac{dv}{dt}\$.
  • $$$$
  • So, an inductor or capacitor will produce a rate-proportional reaction (or response) to something changing. If we say that a capacitor **responds** to a change in voltage, we then have to define that **response** and, the only thing it **can do** is alter its current. Therefore we can say that the transfer function of a capacitor is: its response current (\$i\$) divided by its input (\$\frac{dv}{dt}\$) or this: -
  • $$\dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}} = \dfrac{\text{A current is produced}}{\text{For a change in voltage}}$$
  • And we call that transfer function, (unsurprisingly) capacitance. Rearranging we get this: -
  • $$C = \dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}\hspace{1cm} \text{ or}\hspace{1cm} i = C\cdot\dfrac{dv}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard capacitance formula}$$
  • For an inductor, the reactive output is voltage and, if we went through the same procedure as we did for a capacitor, we would find that: -
  • $$v = L\cdot\dfrac{di}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard inductance formula}$$
#13: Post edited by user avatar Andy aka‭ · 2022-04-24T18:52:10Z (almost 2 years ago)
  • The word "react" implies that something responds to an event. For an inductor, the event is a change in current, \$\frac{di}{dt}\$ and, for a capacitor, the "event" is a change in voltage, \$\frac{dv}{dt}\$.
  • $$$$
  • An inductor or capacitor produces a proportional reaction to something changing at a fixed rate.
  • $$$$
  • If we say that a capacitor **responds** to a change in voltage, we then have to define that **response** and, the only thing it **can do** is alter its current. Therefore we can say that the transfer function of a capacitor is: its response current (\$i\$) divided by its input (\$\frac{dv}{dt}\$) or this: -
  • $$\dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}} = \dfrac{\text{A current is produced}}{\text{For a change in voltage}}$$
  • And we call that transfer function, (unsurprisingly) capacitance. Rearranging we get this: -
  • $$C = \dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}\hspace{1cm} \text{ or}\hspace{1cm} i = C\cdot\dfrac{dv}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard capacitance formula}$$
  • For an inductor, the reactive output is voltage and, if we went through the same procedure as we did for a capacitor, we would find that: -
  • $$v = L\cdot\dfrac{di}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard inductance formula}$$
  • The word "react" implies that something responds to an event. For an inductor, the event is a change in current, \$\frac{di}{dt}\$ and, for a capacitor, the "event" is a change in voltage, \$\frac{dv}{dt}\$.
  • $$$$
  • So, an inductor or capacitor will produce a proportional reaction (or response) to something changing at a fixed rate.
  • $$$$
  • If we say that a capacitor **responds** to a change in voltage, we then have to define that **response** and, the only thing it **can do** is alter its current. Therefore we can say that the transfer function of a capacitor is: its response current (\$i\$) divided by its input (\$\frac{dv}{dt}\$) or this: -
  • $$\dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}} = \dfrac{\text{A current is produced}}{\text{For a change in voltage}}$$
  • And we call that transfer function, (unsurprisingly) capacitance. Rearranging we get this: -
  • $$C = \dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}\hspace{1cm} \text{ or}\hspace{1cm} i = C\cdot\dfrac{dv}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard capacitance formula}$$
  • For an inductor, the reactive output is voltage and, if we went through the same procedure as we did for a capacitor, we would find that: -
  • $$v = L\cdot\dfrac{di}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard inductance formula}$$
#12: Post edited by user avatar Andy aka‭ · 2022-04-24T18:50:27Z (almost 2 years ago)
  • The word "react" implies that something responds to an event. For an inductor, the event is a change in current, \$\frac{di}{dt}\$ and, for a capacitor, the "event" is a change in voltage, \$\frac{dv}{dt}\$.
  • $$$$
  • The inductor or capacitor produces a fixed reaction to something that changes at a fixed rate.
  • $$$$
  • So, if we say that the output of a capacitor is **a reaction** to a change in voltage, we then have to state how it reacts and, the only thing it **can do** is alter the current flow. Therefore we can say that the transfer function of a capacitor is: its output current (\$i\$) over its input (\$\frac{dv}{dt}\$) or this: -
  • $$\dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}} = \dfrac{\text{A current is produced}}{\text{For a change in voltage}}$$
  • And we call that transfer function, (unsurprisingly) capacitance. Rearranging we get this: -
  • $$C = \dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}\hspace{1cm} \text{ or}\hspace{1cm} i = C\cdot\dfrac{dv}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard capacitance formula}$$
  • For an inductor, the reactive output is voltage and, if we went through the same procedure as we did for a capacitor, we would find that: -
  • $$v = L\cdot\dfrac{di}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard inductance formula}$$
  • The word "react" implies that something responds to an event. For an inductor, the event is a change in current, \$\frac{di}{dt}\$ and, for a capacitor, the "event" is a change in voltage, \$\frac{dv}{dt}\$.
  • $$$$
  • An inductor or capacitor produces a proportional reaction to something changing at a fixed rate.
  • $$$$
  • If we say that a capacitor **responds** to a change in voltage, we then have to define that **response** and, the only thing it **can do** is alter its current. Therefore we can say that the transfer function of a capacitor is: its response current (\$i\$) divided by its input (\$\frac{dv}{dt}\$) or this: -
  • $$\dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}} = \dfrac{\text{A current is produced}}{\text{For a change in voltage}}$$
  • And we call that transfer function, (unsurprisingly) capacitance. Rearranging we get this: -
  • $$C = \dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}\hspace{1cm} \text{ or}\hspace{1cm} i = C\cdot\dfrac{dv}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard capacitance formula}$$
  • For an inductor, the reactive output is voltage and, if we went through the same procedure as we did for a capacitor, we would find that: -
  • $$v = L\cdot\dfrac{di}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard inductance formula}$$
#11: Post edited by user avatar Andy aka‭ · 2022-04-24T15:10:27Z (almost 2 years ago)
  • The word "react" implies that something responds to an event. For an inductor, the event is a change in current, \$\frac{di}{dt}\$ and, for a capacitor, the "event" is a change in voltage, \$\frac{dv}{dt}\$.
  • $$$$
  • The inductor or capacitor produces a fixed reaction to something that is changing at a fixed rate.
  • $$$$
  • So, if we say that the output of a capacitor is **a reaction** to a change in voltage, we then have to state how it reacts and, the only thing it **can do** is alter the current flow. Therefore we can say that the transfer function of a capacitor is: its output current (\$i\$) over its input (\$\frac{dv}{dt}\$) or this: -
  • $$\dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}} = \dfrac{\text{A current is produced}}{\text{For a change in voltage}}$$
  • And we call that transfer function, (unsurprisingly) capacitance. Rearranging we get this: -
  • $$C = \dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}\hspace{1cm} \text{ or}\hspace{1cm} i = C\cdot\dfrac{dv}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard capacitance formula}$$
  • For an inductor, the reactive output is voltage and, if we went through the same procedure as we did for a capacitor, we would find that: -
  • $$v = L\cdot\dfrac{di}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard inductance formula}$$
  • The word "react" implies that something responds to an event. For an inductor, the event is a change in current, \$\frac{di}{dt}\$ and, for a capacitor, the "event" is a change in voltage, \$\frac{dv}{dt}\$.
  • $$$$
  • The inductor or capacitor produces a fixed reaction to something that changes at a fixed rate.
  • $$$$
  • So, if we say that the output of a capacitor is **a reaction** to a change in voltage, we then have to state how it reacts and, the only thing it **can do** is alter the current flow. Therefore we can say that the transfer function of a capacitor is: its output current (\$i\$) over its input (\$\frac{dv}{dt}\$) or this: -
  • $$\dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}} = \dfrac{\text{A current is produced}}{\text{For a change in voltage}}$$
  • And we call that transfer function, (unsurprisingly) capacitance. Rearranging we get this: -
  • $$C = \dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}\hspace{1cm} \text{ or}\hspace{1cm} i = C\cdot\dfrac{dv}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard capacitance formula}$$
  • For an inductor, the reactive output is voltage and, if we went through the same procedure as we did for a capacitor, we would find that: -
  • $$v = L\cdot\dfrac{di}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard inductance formula}$$
#10: Post edited by user avatar Andy aka‭ · 2022-04-24T15:08:29Z (almost 2 years ago)
  • The word "react" implies that something responds to an event. For an inductor, the event is a change in current, \$\frac{di}{dt}\$ and, for a capacitor, the "event" is a change in voltage, \$\frac{dv}{dt}\$.
  • $$$$
  • And, of course you can't define a \$\frac{dx}{dt}\$ event in **zero time** hence, the inductor or capacitor is producing a fixed reaction to something that is changing at a fixed rate.
  • $$$$
  • So, if we say that the output of a capacitor is **a reaction** to a change in voltage, we then have to state how it reacts and, the only thing it **can do** is alter the current flow. Therefore we can say that the transfer function of a capacitor is: its output current (\$i\$) over its input (\$\frac{dv}{dt}\$) or this: -
  • $$\dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}} = \dfrac{\text{A current is produced}}{\text{For a change in voltage}}$$
  • And we call that transfer function, (unsurprisingly) capacitance. Rearranging we get this: -
  • $$C = \dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}\hspace{1cm} \text{ or}\hspace{1cm} i = C\cdot\dfrac{dv}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard capacitance formula}$$
  • For an inductor, the reactive output is voltage and, if we went through the same procedure as we did for a capacitor, we would find that: -
  • $$v = L\cdot\dfrac{di}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard inductance formula}$$
  • The word "react" implies that something responds to an event. For an inductor, the event is a change in current, \$\frac{di}{dt}\$ and, for a capacitor, the "event" is a change in voltage, \$\frac{dv}{dt}\$.
  • $$$$
  • The inductor or capacitor produces a fixed reaction to something that is changing at a fixed rate.
  • $$$$
  • So, if we say that the output of a capacitor is **a reaction** to a change in voltage, we then have to state how it reacts and, the only thing it **can do** is alter the current flow. Therefore we can say that the transfer function of a capacitor is: its output current (\$i\$) over its input (\$\frac{dv}{dt}\$) or this: -
  • $$\dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}} = \dfrac{\text{A current is produced}}{\text{For a change in voltage}}$$
  • And we call that transfer function, (unsurprisingly) capacitance. Rearranging we get this: -
  • $$C = \dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}\hspace{1cm} \text{ or}\hspace{1cm} i = C\cdot\dfrac{dv}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard capacitance formula}$$
  • For an inductor, the reactive output is voltage and, if we went through the same procedure as we did for a capacitor, we would find that: -
  • $$v = L\cdot\dfrac{di}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard inductance formula}$$
#9: Post edited by user avatar Andy aka‭ · 2022-04-24T15:06:53Z (almost 2 years ago)
  • The word "react" implies that something responds to an event. For an inductor, the event is a change in current, \$\frac{di}{dt}\$ and, for a capacitor, the "event" is a change in voltage, \$\frac{dv}{dt}\$.
  • $$$$
  • And, of course you can't define a \$\frac{dx}{dt}\$ event in **zero time** hence, the inductor or capacitor is "reacting" to something that is changing.
  • $$$$
  • So, if we say that the output of a capacitor is **a reaction** to a change in voltage, we then have to state how it reacts and, the only thing it **can do** is alter the current flow. Therefore we can say that the transfer function of a capacitor is its output (current) over input (\$\frac{dv}{dt}\$) or this: -
  • $$\dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}} = \dfrac{\text{A current is produced}}{\text{For a change in voltage}}$$
  • And we call that transfer function, (unsurprisingly) capacitance. Rearranging we get this: -
  • $$C = \dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}\hspace{1cm} \text{ or}\hspace{1cm} i = C\cdot\dfrac{dv}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard capacitance formula}$$
  • For an inductor, the reactive output is voltage and, if we went through the same procedure as we did for a capacitor, we would find that: -
  • $$v = L\cdot\dfrac{di}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard inductance formula}$$
  • The word "react" implies that something responds to an event. For an inductor, the event is a change in current, \$\frac{di}{dt}\$ and, for a capacitor, the "event" is a change in voltage, \$\frac{dv}{dt}\$.
  • $$$$
  • And, of course you can't define a \$\frac{dx}{dt}\$ event in **zero time** hence, the inductor or capacitor is producing a fixed reaction to something that is changing at a fixed rate.
  • $$$$
  • So, if we say that the output of a capacitor is **a reaction** to a change in voltage, we then have to state how it reacts and, the only thing it **can do** is alter the current flow. Therefore we can say that the transfer function of a capacitor is: its output current (\$i\$) over its input (\$\frac{dv}{dt}\$) or this: -
  • $$\dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}} = \dfrac{\text{A current is produced}}{\text{For a change in voltage}}$$
  • And we call that transfer function, (unsurprisingly) capacitance. Rearranging we get this: -
  • $$C = \dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}\hspace{1cm} \text{ or}\hspace{1cm} i = C\cdot\dfrac{dv}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard capacitance formula}$$
  • For an inductor, the reactive output is voltage and, if we went through the same procedure as we did for a capacitor, we would find that: -
  • $$v = L\cdot\dfrac{di}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard inductance formula}$$
#8: Post edited by user avatar Andy aka‭ · 2022-04-23T17:01:34Z (about 2 years ago)
  • The word "react" implies that something responds to an event change. For an inductor, the event is a change in current, \$\frac{di}{dt}\$ and, for a capacitor, the "event" is a change in voltage, \$\frac{dv}{dt}\$.
  • $$$$
  • And, of course you can't define a \$\frac{dx}{dt}\$ event in **zero time** hence, the inductor or capacitor is "reacting" to something that is changing.
  • $$$$
  • So, if we say that the output of a capacitor is **a reaction** to a change in voltage, we then have to state how it reacts and, the only thing it **can do** is alter the current flow. Therefore we can say that the transfer function of a capacitor is its output (current) over input (\$\frac{dv}{dt}\$) or this: -
  • $$\dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}} = \dfrac{\text{A current is produced}}{\text{For a change in voltage}}$$
  • And we call that transfer function, (unsurprisingly) capacitance. Rearranging we get this: -
  • $$C = \dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}\hspace{1cm} \text{ or}\hspace{1cm} i = C\cdot\dfrac{dv}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard capacitance formula}$$
  • For an inductor, the reactive output is voltage and, if we went through the same procedure as we did for a capacitor, we would find that: -
  • $$v = L\cdot\dfrac{di}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard inductance formula}$$
  • The word "react" implies that something responds to an event. For an inductor, the event is a change in current, \$\frac{di}{dt}\$ and, for a capacitor, the "event" is a change in voltage, \$\frac{dv}{dt}\$.
  • $$$$
  • And, of course you can't define a \$\frac{dx}{dt}\$ event in **zero time** hence, the inductor or capacitor is "reacting" to something that is changing.
  • $$$$
  • So, if we say that the output of a capacitor is **a reaction** to a change in voltage, we then have to state how it reacts and, the only thing it **can do** is alter the current flow. Therefore we can say that the transfer function of a capacitor is its output (current) over input (\$\frac{dv}{dt}\$) or this: -
  • $$\dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}} = \dfrac{\text{A current is produced}}{\text{For a change in voltage}}$$
  • And we call that transfer function, (unsurprisingly) capacitance. Rearranging we get this: -
  • $$C = \dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}\hspace{1cm} \text{ or}\hspace{1cm} i = C\cdot\dfrac{dv}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard capacitance formula}$$
  • For an inductor, the reactive output is voltage and, if we went through the same procedure as we did for a capacitor, we would find that: -
  • $$v = L\cdot\dfrac{di}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard inductance formula}$$
#7: Post edited by user avatar Andy aka‭ · 2022-04-23T09:06:39Z (about 2 years ago)
  • The word "react" implies that something responds to an event change. For an inductor, the event is a change in current, \$\frac{di}{dt}\$ and, for a capacitor, the "event" is a change in voltage, \$\frac{dv}{dt}\$.
  • $$$$
  • And, of course you can't measure a \$\frac{dx}{dt}\$ event in **zero time** hence, the inductor or capacitor is "reacting" to something that is changing; there is a _"reactance"_.
  • $$$$
  • So, if we say that the output of a capacitor is **a reactance** to a change in voltage we then have to state how it reacts and, the only thing it **can do** is alter current. Therefore we can say that the transfer function of a capacitor is its output (current) over input (\$\frac{dv}{dt}\$) or this: -
  • $$\dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}} = \dfrac{\text{A current is produced}}{\text{For a change in voltage}}$$
  • And we call that transfer function, (unsurprisingly) capacitance. Rearranging we get this: -
  • $$C = \dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}\hspace{1cm} \text{ or}\hspace{1cm} i = C\cdot\dfrac{dv}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard capacitance formula}$$
  • For an inductor, the reactive output is voltage and, if we went through the same procedure as we did for a capacitor, we would find that: -
  • $$v = L\cdot\dfrac{di}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard inductance formula}$$
  • The word "react" implies that something responds to an event change. For an inductor, the event is a change in current, \$\frac{di}{dt}\$ and, for a capacitor, the "event" is a change in voltage, \$\frac{dv}{dt}\$.
  • $$$$
  • And, of course you can't define a \$\frac{dx}{dt}\$ event in **zero time** hence, the inductor or capacitor is "reacting" to something that is changing.
  • $$$$
  • So, if we say that the output of a capacitor is **a reaction** to a change in voltage, we then have to state how it reacts and, the only thing it **can do** is alter the current flow. Therefore we can say that the transfer function of a capacitor is its output (current) over input (\$\frac{dv}{dt}\$) or this: -
  • $$\dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}} = \dfrac{\text{A current is produced}}{\text{For a change in voltage}}$$
  • And we call that transfer function, (unsurprisingly) capacitance. Rearranging we get this: -
  • $$C = \dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}\hspace{1cm} \text{ or}\hspace{1cm} i = C\cdot\dfrac{dv}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard capacitance formula}$$
  • For an inductor, the reactive output is voltage and, if we went through the same procedure as we did for a capacitor, we would find that: -
  • $$v = L\cdot\dfrac{di}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard inductance formula}$$
#6: Post edited by user avatar Andy aka‭ · 2022-04-23T08:54:44Z (about 2 years ago)
  • "Reactance" is a word that is similar to "resistance" but, it's not the same; there is a subtle difference. The word "react" implies that something "reacts" to an event. For an inductor, the event is a change in current, \$\frac{di}{dt}\$ and, for a capacitor, the "event" is a change in voltage, \$\frac{dv}{dt}\$.
  • $$$$
  • And, of course you can't measure a \$\frac{dx}{dt}\$ event in **zero time** hence, the inductor or capacitor is "reacting" to something that is changing; there is a _"reactance"_.
  • $$$$
  • So, if we say that the output of a capacitor is **a reactance** to a change in voltage we then have to state how it reacts and, the only thing it **can do** is alter current. Therefore we can say that the transfer function of a capacitor is its output (current) over input (\$\frac{dv}{dt}\$) or this: -
  • $$\dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}} = \dfrac{\text{A current is produced}}{\text{For a change in voltage}}$$
  • And we call that transfer function, (unsurprisingly) capacitance. Rearranging we get this: -
  • $$C = \dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}\hspace{1cm} \text{ or}\hspace{1cm} i = C\cdot\dfrac{dv}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard capacitance formula}$$
  • For an inductor, the reactive output is voltage and, if we went through the same procedure as we did for a capacitor, we would find that: -
  • $$v = L\cdot\dfrac{di}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard inductance formula}$$
  • The word "react" implies that something responds to an event change. For an inductor, the event is a change in current, \$\frac{di}{dt}\$ and, for a capacitor, the "event" is a change in voltage, \$\frac{dv}{dt}\$.
  • $$$$
  • And, of course you can't measure a \$\frac{dx}{dt}\$ event in **zero time** hence, the inductor or capacitor is "reacting" to something that is changing; there is a _"reactance"_.
  • $$$$
  • So, if we say that the output of a capacitor is **a reactance** to a change in voltage we then have to state how it reacts and, the only thing it **can do** is alter current. Therefore we can say that the transfer function of a capacitor is its output (current) over input (\$\frac{dv}{dt}\$) or this: -
  • $$\dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}} = \dfrac{\text{A current is produced}}{\text{For a change in voltage}}$$
  • And we call that transfer function, (unsurprisingly) capacitance. Rearranging we get this: -
  • $$C = \dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}\hspace{1cm} \text{ or}\hspace{1cm} i = C\cdot\dfrac{dv}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard capacitance formula}$$
  • For an inductor, the reactive output is voltage and, if we went through the same procedure as we did for a capacitor, we would find that: -
  • $$v = L\cdot\dfrac{di}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard inductance formula}$$
#5: Post edited by user avatar Andy aka‭ · 2022-04-22T18:24:36Z (about 2 years ago)
  • "Reactance" is a word that is similar to "resistance" but, it's not the same; there is a subtle difference. The word "react" implies that something "reacts" to an event. For an inductor, the event is a change in current, \$\frac{di}{dt}\$ and, for a capacitor, the "event" is a change in voltage, \$\frac{dv}{dt}\$.
  • $$$$
  • And, of course you can't measure a \$\frac{dx}{dt}\$ event in **zero time** hence, the inductor or capacitor is "reacting" to something that is changing; there is a _"reactance"_.
  • $$$$
  • So, if we say that the output of a capacitor is **a reactance** to a change in voltage we then have to state how it reacts and, the only thing it **can do** is alter current. Therefore we can say that the transfer function of a capacitor is its output (current) over input (\$\frac{dv}{dt}\$) or this: -
  • $$\dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}} = \dfrac{\text{A current is produced}}{\text{For a change in voltage}}$$
  • And we call that transfer function, (unsurprisingly) capacitance. Rearranging we get this: -
  • $$C = \dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}\hspace{1cm} \text{ or}\hspace{1cm} i = C\dfrac{dv}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard capacitance formula}$$
  • For an inductor, the reactive output is voltage and, if we went through the same procedure as we did for a capacitor, we would find that: -
  • $$v = L\dfrac{di}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard inductance formula}$$
  • "Reactance" is a word that is similar to "resistance" but, it's not the same; there is a subtle difference. The word "react" implies that something "reacts" to an event. For an inductor, the event is a change in current, \$\frac{di}{dt}\$ and, for a capacitor, the "event" is a change in voltage, \$\frac{dv}{dt}\$.
  • $$$$
  • And, of course you can't measure a \$\frac{dx}{dt}\$ event in **zero time** hence, the inductor or capacitor is "reacting" to something that is changing; there is a _"reactance"_.
  • $$$$
  • So, if we say that the output of a capacitor is **a reactance** to a change in voltage we then have to state how it reacts and, the only thing it **can do** is alter current. Therefore we can say that the transfer function of a capacitor is its output (current) over input (\$\frac{dv}{dt}\$) or this: -
  • $$\dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}} = \dfrac{\text{A current is produced}}{\text{For a change in voltage}}$$
  • And we call that transfer function, (unsurprisingly) capacitance. Rearranging we get this: -
  • $$C = \dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}\hspace{1cm} \text{ or}\hspace{1cm} i = C\cdot\dfrac{dv}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard capacitance formula}$$
  • For an inductor, the reactive output is voltage and, if we went through the same procedure as we did for a capacitor, we would find that: -
  • $$v = L\cdot\dfrac{di}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard inductance formula}$$
#4: Post edited by user avatar Andy aka‭ · 2022-04-22T18:23:54Z (about 2 years ago)
  • "Reactance" is a word that is similar to "resistance" but, it's not the same; there is a subtle difference. The word "react" implies that something "reacts" to an event. For an inductor, the event is a change in current, \$\frac{di}{dt}\$ and, for a capacitor, the "event" is a change in voltage, \$\frac{dv}{dt}\$.
  • $$$$
  • And, of course you can't measure a \$\frac{dx}{dt}\$ event in **zero time** hence, the inductor or capacitor is "reacting" to something that is changing; there is a _"reactance"_.
  • $$$$
  • So, if we say that the output of a capacitor is **a reactance** to a change in voltage we then have to state how it reacts and, the only thing it **can do** is alter current. Therefore we can say that the transfer function of a capacitor is its output (current) over input (\$\frac{dv}{dt}\$) or this: -
  • $$\dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}} = \dfrac{\text{A current is produced}}{\text{For a change in voltage}}$$
  • And we call that transfer function, (unsurprisingly) capacitance. Rearranging we get this: -
  • $$C = \dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}\hspace{1cm} \text{ or}\hspace{1cm} i = C\dfrac{dv}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard capacitance formula}$$
  • For an inductor, the reactive output is voltage and, if we went through the same procedure as we did for a capacitor, we would find that: -
  • $$v = L\dfrac{di}{dt}$$
  • "Reactance" is a word that is similar to "resistance" but, it's not the same; there is a subtle difference. The word "react" implies that something "reacts" to an event. For an inductor, the event is a change in current, \$\frac{di}{dt}\$ and, for a capacitor, the "event" is a change in voltage, \$\frac{dv}{dt}\$.
  • $$$$
  • And, of course you can't measure a \$\frac{dx}{dt}\$ event in **zero time** hence, the inductor or capacitor is "reacting" to something that is changing; there is a _"reactance"_.
  • $$$$
  • So, if we say that the output of a capacitor is **a reactance** to a change in voltage we then have to state how it reacts and, the only thing it **can do** is alter current. Therefore we can say that the transfer function of a capacitor is its output (current) over input (\$\frac{dv}{dt}\$) or this: -
  • $$\dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}} = \dfrac{\text{A current is produced}}{\text{For a change in voltage}}$$
  • And we call that transfer function, (unsurprisingly) capacitance. Rearranging we get this: -
  • $$C = \dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}\hspace{1cm} \text{ or}\hspace{1cm} i = C\dfrac{dv}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard capacitance formula}$$
  • For an inductor, the reactive output is voltage and, if we went through the same procedure as we did for a capacitor, we would find that: -
  • $$v = L\dfrac{di}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard inductance formula}$$
#3: Post edited by user avatar Andy aka‭ · 2022-04-22T18:22:56Z (about 2 years ago)
  • "Reactance" is a word that is similar to "resistance" but, it's not the same; there is a subtle difference. The word "react" implies that something "reacts" to an event. For an inductor, the event is a change in current, \$\frac{di}{dt}\$ and, for a capacitor, the "event" is a change in voltage, \$\frac{dv}{dt}\$.
  • $$$$
  • And, of course you can't measure a \$\frac{dx}{dt}\$ event in **zero time** hence, the inductor or capacitor is "reacting" to something that is changing.
  • $$$$
  • So, if we say that the output of a capacitor is **a reactance** to a change in voltage we then have to state how it reacts and, the only thing it **can do** is alter current. Therefore we can say that the transfer function of a capacitor is its output (current) over input (\$\frac{dv}{dt}\$) or this: -
  • $$\dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}$$
  • And we call that transfer function, (unsurprisingly) capacitance. Rearranging we get this: -
  • $$C = \dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}\hspace{1cm} \text{ or}\hspace{1cm} i = C\dfrac{dv}{dt}$$
  • For an inductor, the reactive output is voltage and, if we went through the same procedure as we did (above) for a capacitor we would find that: -
  • $$v = L\dfrac{di}{dt}$$
  • "Reactance" is a word that is similar to "resistance" but, it's not the same; there is a subtle difference. The word "react" implies that something "reacts" to an event. For an inductor, the event is a change in current, \$\frac{di}{dt}\$ and, for a capacitor, the "event" is a change in voltage, \$\frac{dv}{dt}\$.
  • $$$$
  • And, of course you can't measure a \$\frac{dx}{dt}\$ event in **zero time** hence, the inductor or capacitor is "reacting" to something that is changing; there is a _"reactance"_.
  • $$$$
  • So, if we say that the output of a capacitor is **a reactance** to a change in voltage we then have to state how it reacts and, the only thing it **can do** is alter current. Therefore we can say that the transfer function of a capacitor is its output (current) over input (\$\frac{dv}{dt}\$) or this: -
  • $$\dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}} = \dfrac{\text{A current is produced}}{\text{For a change in voltage}}$$
  • And we call that transfer function, (unsurprisingly) capacitance. Rearranging we get this: -
  • $$C = \dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}\hspace{1cm} \text{ or}\hspace{1cm} i = C\dfrac{dv}{dt}\hspace{1cm} \text{ the standard capacitance formula}$$
  • For an inductor, the reactive output is voltage and, if we went through the same procedure as we did for a capacitor, we would find that: -
  • $$v = L\dfrac{di}{dt}$$
#2: Post edited by user avatar Andy aka‭ · 2022-04-22T18:01:45Z (about 2 years ago)
  • "Reactance" is a word that is similar to "resistance" but, it's not the same; there is a subtloe difference. The word "react" implies that something "reacts" to an event. For an inductor, the event is a change in current, \$\frac{di}{dt}\$ and, for a capacitor, the "event" is a change in voltage, \$\frac{dv}{dt}\$.
  • $$$$
  • And, of course you can't measure a \$\frac{dx}{dt}\$ event in **zero time** hence, the inductor or capacitor is "reacting" to something that is changing.
  • $$$$
  • So, if we say that the output of a capacitor is **a reactance** to a change in voltage we then have to state how it reacts and, the only thing it **can do** is alter current. Therefore we can say that the transfer function of a capacitor is its output (current) over input (\$\frac{dv}{dt}\$) or this: -
  • $$\dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}$$
  • And we call that transfer function, (unsurprisingly) capacitance. Rearranging we get this: -
  • $$C = \dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}\hspace{1cm} \text{ or}\hspace{1cm} i = C\dfrac{dv}{dt}$$
  • For an inductor, the reactive output is voltage and, if we went through the same procedure as we did (above) for a capacitor we would find that: -
  • $$v = L\dfrac{di}{dt}$$
  • "Reactance" is a word that is similar to "resistance" but, it's not the same; there is a subtle difference. The word "react" implies that something "reacts" to an event. For an inductor, the event is a change in current, \$\frac{di}{dt}\$ and, for a capacitor, the "event" is a change in voltage, \$\frac{dv}{dt}\$.
  • $$$$
  • And, of course you can't measure a \$\frac{dx}{dt}\$ event in **zero time** hence, the inductor or capacitor is "reacting" to something that is changing.
  • $$$$
  • So, if we say that the output of a capacitor is **a reactance** to a change in voltage we then have to state how it reacts and, the only thing it **can do** is alter current. Therefore we can say that the transfer function of a capacitor is its output (current) over input (\$\frac{dv}{dt}\$) or this: -
  • $$\dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}$$
  • And we call that transfer function, (unsurprisingly) capacitance. Rearranging we get this: -
  • $$C = \dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}\hspace{1cm} \text{ or}\hspace{1cm} i = C\dfrac{dv}{dt}$$
  • For an inductor, the reactive output is voltage and, if we went through the same procedure as we did (above) for a capacitor we would find that: -
  • $$v = L\dfrac{di}{dt}$$
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Andy aka‭ · 2022-04-22T18:00:22Z (about 2 years ago)
"Reactance" is a word that is similar to "resistance" but, it's not the same; there is a subtloe difference. The word "react" implies that something "reacts" to an event. For an inductor, the event is a change in current, \$\frac{di}{dt}\$ and, for a capacitor, the "event" is a change in voltage, \$\frac{dv}{dt}\$.
$$$$
And, of course you can't measure a \$\frac{dx}{dt}\$ event in **zero time** hence, the inductor or capacitor is "reacting" to something that is changing. 
$$$$
So, if we say that the output of a capacitor is **a reactance** to a change in voltage we then have to state how it reacts and, the only thing it **can do** is alter current. Therefore we can say that the transfer function of a capacitor is its output (current) over input (\$\frac{dv}{dt}\$) or this: -

$$\dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}$$

And we call that transfer function, (unsurprisingly) capacitance. Rearranging we get this: -

$$C = \dfrac{i}{\frac{dv}{dt}}\hspace{1cm} \text{ or}\hspace{1cm} i = C\dfrac{dv}{dt}$$

For an inductor, the reactive output is voltage and, if we went through the same procedure as we did (above) for a capacitor we would find that: -

$$v = L\dfrac{di}{dt}$$