Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

62%
+3 −1
Q&A Having a hard time understanding discrete audio amplifier output stage error corrector circuit

I'm trying to implement a circuit I read about in a book recently, but having a hard time deriving the relationships for the required impedances for error corrector balance. Here is the circuit: ...

0 answers  ·  posted 4mo ago by drinkingcube‭  ·  edited 4mo ago by Nick Alexeev‭

#3: Post edited by user avatar Nick Alexeev‭ · 2024-08-19T15:07:13Z (4 months ago)
  • Having a hard time understanding discrete audio amplifier output stage error corrector circuit, any thoughts?
  • Having a hard time understanding discrete audio amplifier output stage error corrector circuit
  • Edit: I have been informed on stackoverflow that "any thoughts" isn't a valid question about electronics.... if this is an issue, my apologies and please let me know if I need to condense my question further.
  • I'm trying to implement a circuit I read about in a book recently, but having a hard time deriving the relationships for the required impedances for error corrector balance.
  • Here is the circuit:
  • ![circuit](https://electrical.codidact.com/uploads/qs8ojre2ydam7vejxw9xyogts641)
  • - The amplifier second stage (VAS) drives the output stage through dr+
  • and dr-
  • - The error corrector circuit entails Q5,10,11,6 and
  • R1,2,3,4,5.
  • - From what I've managed to understand from the book, this
  • is essentially a unity gain diff amp, where the node "fb" (which
  • contains all base current nonlinearities and voltage gain errors) is
  • compared against the VAS signal, and then the difference is
  • subtracted through R4/5 as a current.
  • I've been having a hard time figuring out what design rules / considerations, and thought I would ask here to see if anyone had any ideas / suggestions:
  • - R1/R2: the book mentions that it might be helpful to "attenuate the error signal" through R1/R2. My assumptions for R1 is that it needs to be higher impedance than say, 200 ohms, as to load down the output stage as little as possible. I am lost on what the purpose of R2 is. Equal current sharing?
  • - R3: the book states that R3 limits transconductance of Q11/6. This makes sense to me as it would contribute to the gm of either transistor equally, and maybe it's functioning as a summing node for the emitter currents of Q11/6? My guess with R3 is that it needs to small/small-ish.
  • - Q3/Q4: I believe these transistors provide a high impedance input to the VAS signal, and a low impedance output to the drivers for the output transistors. Also, I think that they act as the injection point for the error signal through R4/5.
  • - R4/5: this is where I'm completely lost. The book states that R4/5 act as the method for adding the error signal back into the VAS signal, effectively cancelling out the output stage error. My best guess with R4/5 is that there is some expression that involves the gm of Q11/6 to scale the output current proportionally to achieve corrector balance through some arithmetic combination of the current through R4/5 and its respective pre-driver transistor (Q3/4).
  • These are the ideas I've been having. If anything else comes to mind I'll try to edit the post, but would appreciate any ideas/discourse as I haven't been making much progress with my attempted analysis.
  • Thanks!
  • I'm trying to implement a circuit I read about in a book recently, but having a hard time deriving the relationships for the required impedances for error corrector balance.
  • Here is the circuit:
  • ![circuit](https://electrical.codidact.com/uploads/qs8ojre2ydam7vejxw9xyogts641)
  • - The amplifier second stage (VAS) drives the output stage through dr+
  • and dr-
  • - The error corrector circuit entails Q5,10,11,6 and
  • R1,2,3,4,5.
  • - From what I've managed to understand from the book, this
  • is essentially a unity gain diff amp, where the node "fb" (which
  • contains all base current nonlinearities and voltage gain errors) is
  • compared against the VAS signal, and then the difference is
  • subtracted through R4/5 as a current.
  • I've been having a hard time figuring out what design rules / considerations, and thought I would ask here to see if anyone had any ideas / suggestions:
  • - R1/R2: the book mentions that it might be helpful to "attenuate the error signal" through R1/R2. My assumptions for R1 is that it needs to be higher impedance than say, 200 ohms, as to load down the output stage as little as possible. I am lost on what the purpose of R2 is. Equal current sharing?
  • - R3: the book states that R3 limits transconductance of Q11/6. This makes sense to me as it would contribute to the gm of either transistor equally, and maybe it's functioning as a summing node for the emitter currents of Q11/6? My guess with R3 is that it needs to small/small-ish.
  • - Q3/Q4: I believe these transistors provide a high impedance input to the VAS signal, and a low impedance output to the drivers for the output transistors. Also, I think that they act as the injection point for the error signal through R4/5.
  • - R4/5: this is where I'm completely lost. The book states that R4/5 act as the method for adding the error signal back into the VAS signal, effectively cancelling out the output stage error. My best guess with R4/5 is that there is some expression that involves the gm of Q11/6 to scale the output current proportionally to achieve corrector balance through some arithmetic combination of the current through R4/5 and its respective pre-driver transistor (Q3/4).
  • These are the ideas I've been having. If anything else comes to mind I'll try to edit the post, but would appreciate any ideas/discourse as I haven't been making much progress with my attempted analysis.
#2: Post edited by user avatar drinkingcube‭ · 2024-08-19T04:45:45Z (4 months ago)
  • I'm trying to implement a circuit I read about in a book recently, but having a hard time deriving the relationships for the required impedances for error corrector balance.
  • Here is the circuit:
  • ![circuit](https://electrical.codidact.com/uploads/qs8ojre2ydam7vejxw9xyogts641)
  • - The amplifier second stage (VAS) drives the output stage through dr+
  • and dr-
  • - The error corrector circuit entails Q5,10,11,6 and
  • R1,2,3,4,5.
  • - From what I've managed to understand from the book, this
  • is essentially a unity gain diff amp, where the node "fb" (which
  • contains all base current nonlinearities and voltage gain errors) is
  • compared against the VAS signal, and then the difference is
  • subtracted through R4/5 as a current.
  • I've been having a hard time figuring out what design rules / considerations, and thought I would ask here to see if anyone had any ideas / suggestions:
  • - R1/R2: the book mentions that it might be helpful to "attenuate the error signal" through R1/R2. My assumptions for R1 is that it needs to be higher impedance than say, 200 ohms, as to load down the output stage as little as possible. I am lost on what the purpose of R2 is. Equal current sharing?
  • - R3: the book states that R3 limits transconductance of Q11/6. This makes sense to me as it would contribute to the gm of either transistor equally, and maybe it's functioning as a summing node for the emitter currents of Q11/6? My guess with R3 is that it needs to small/small-ish.
  • - Q3/Q4: I believe these transistors provide a high impedance input to the VAS signal, and a low impedance output to the drivers for the output transistors. Also, I think that they act as the injection point for the error signal through R4/5.
  • - R4/5: this is where I'm completely lost. The book states that R4/5 act as the method for adding the error signal back into the VAS signal, effectively cancelling out the output stage error. My best guess with R4/5 is that there is some expression that involves the gm of Q11/6 to scale the output current proportionally to achieve corrector balance through some arithmetic combination of the current through R4/5 and its respective pre-driver transistor (Q3/4).
  • These are the ideas I've been having. If anything else comes to mind I'll try to edit the post, but would appreciate any ideas/discourse as I haven't been making much progress with my attempted analysis.
  • Thanks!
  • Edit: I have been informed on stackoverflow that "any thoughts" isn't a valid question about electronics.... if this is an issue, my apologies and please let me know if I need to condense my question further.
  • I'm trying to implement a circuit I read about in a book recently, but having a hard time deriving the relationships for the required impedances for error corrector balance.
  • Here is the circuit:
  • ![circuit](https://electrical.codidact.com/uploads/qs8ojre2ydam7vejxw9xyogts641)
  • - The amplifier second stage (VAS) drives the output stage through dr+
  • and dr-
  • - The error corrector circuit entails Q5,10,11,6 and
  • R1,2,3,4,5.
  • - From what I've managed to understand from the book, this
  • is essentially a unity gain diff amp, where the node "fb" (which
  • contains all base current nonlinearities and voltage gain errors) is
  • compared against the VAS signal, and then the difference is
  • subtracted through R4/5 as a current.
  • I've been having a hard time figuring out what design rules / considerations, and thought I would ask here to see if anyone had any ideas / suggestions:
  • - R1/R2: the book mentions that it might be helpful to "attenuate the error signal" through R1/R2. My assumptions for R1 is that it needs to be higher impedance than say, 200 ohms, as to load down the output stage as little as possible. I am lost on what the purpose of R2 is. Equal current sharing?
  • - R3: the book states that R3 limits transconductance of Q11/6. This makes sense to me as it would contribute to the gm of either transistor equally, and maybe it's functioning as a summing node for the emitter currents of Q11/6? My guess with R3 is that it needs to small/small-ish.
  • - Q3/Q4: I believe these transistors provide a high impedance input to the VAS signal, and a low impedance output to the drivers for the output transistors. Also, I think that they act as the injection point for the error signal through R4/5.
  • - R4/5: this is where I'm completely lost. The book states that R4/5 act as the method for adding the error signal back into the VAS signal, effectively cancelling out the output stage error. My best guess with R4/5 is that there is some expression that involves the gm of Q11/6 to scale the output current proportionally to achieve corrector balance through some arithmetic combination of the current through R4/5 and its respective pre-driver transistor (Q3/4).
  • These are the ideas I've been having. If anything else comes to mind I'll try to edit the post, but would appreciate any ideas/discourse as I haven't been making much progress with my attempted analysis.
  • Thanks!
#1: Initial revision by user avatar drinkingcube‭ · 2024-08-19T03:53:31Z (4 months ago)
Having a hard time understanding discrete audio amplifier output stage error corrector circuit, any thoughts?
I'm trying to implement a circuit I read about in a book recently, but having a hard time deriving the relationships for the required impedances for error corrector balance.

Here is the circuit:

![circuit](https://electrical.codidact.com/uploads/qs8ojre2ydam7vejxw9xyogts641)

 - The amplifier second stage (VAS) drives the output stage through dr+
   and dr-
 - The error corrector circuit entails Q5,10,11,6 and
   R1,2,3,4,5. 
 - From what I've managed to understand from the book, this
   is essentially a unity gain diff amp, where the node "fb" (which
   contains all base current nonlinearities and voltage gain errors) is
   compared against the VAS signal, and then the difference is
   subtracted through R4/5 as a current.

I've been having a hard time figuring out what design rules / considerations, and thought I would ask here to see if anyone had any ideas / suggestions:

 - R1/R2: the book mentions that it might be helpful to "attenuate the error signal" through R1/R2. My assumptions for R1 is that it needs to be higher impedance than say, 200 ohms, as to load down the output stage as little as possible. I am lost on what the purpose of R2 is. Equal current sharing?
 - R3: the book states that R3 limits transconductance of Q11/6. This makes sense to me as it would contribute to the gm of either transistor equally, and maybe it's functioning as a summing node for the emitter currents of Q11/6? My guess with R3 is that it needs to small/small-ish.
 - Q3/Q4: I believe these transistors provide a high impedance input to the VAS signal, and a low impedance output to the drivers for the output transistors. Also, I think that they act as the injection point for the error signal through R4/5.
 - R4/5: this is where I'm completely lost. The book states that R4/5 act as the method for adding the error signal back into the VAS signal, effectively cancelling out the output stage error. My best guess with R4/5 is that there is some expression that involves the gm of Q11/6 to scale the output current proportionally to achieve corrector balance through some arithmetic combination of the current through R4/5 and its respective pre-driver transistor (Q3/4).

These are the ideas I've been having. If anything else comes to mind I'll try to edit the post, but would appreciate any ideas/discourse as I haven't been making much progress with my attempted analysis.

Thanks!