Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

66%
+2 −0
Q&A OPA2211 datasheet discrepancy

You are right in that the gain at 80 MHz is clearly not 100. Both the initial marketing points and the graph seem to agree on a gain⋅bandwidth of 45 MHz. There does appear to be a slight kink in ...

posted 24d ago by Olin Lathrop‭

Answer
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Olin Lathrop‭ · 2024-10-28T18:45:16Z (24 days ago)
You are right in that the gain at 80 MHz is clearly not 100.  Both the initial marketing points and the graph seem to agree on a gain&sdot;bandwidth of 45 MHz.

There does appear to be a slight kink in the gain curve at 800 kHz, but it looks like the gain is a bit below 100 there.  A gain of 100 at 800 kHz seems excessive given unity gain at 45 MHz.  Maybe they are trying to say the gain falls off faster than 1/f above 800 kHz.

I would certainly ask for clarification from TI before relying on any of these parameters.  Or, use a different amp with specs that don't contradict themselves.