Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

60%
+1 −0
Q&A OPA2211 datasheet discrepancy

The 1st page of a datasheet is written by marketing. It can still give you an idea of what the chip is about, but it often contains the performance data under the best conditions. The conditions ...

posted 2mo ago by Nick Alexeev‭  ·  edited 1mo ago by Nick Alexeev‭

Answer
#4: Post edited by user avatar Nick Alexeev‭ · 2024-11-09T18:50:33Z (about 1 month ago)
  • The 1st page of a datasheet is written by marketing. It can still give you an idea of what the chip is about, but it often contains the performance data under the best conditions. The conditions are rarely specified on the 1st page.
  • Always check the electrical characteristics section and the charts. That’s the engineering information, and the source of truth. If tables & charts don’t agree with the 1st page, then go by tables & charts.
  • When the 1st page doesn’t fully agree with tables & charts, that’s rarely an engineering error, that’s usually marketing and specsmanship.
  • The 1st page of a datasheet is written by marketing. It can still give you an idea of what the chip is about, but it often contains the performance data under the best conditions. The conditions are rarely specified on the 1st page.
  • Always check the electrical characteristics section and the charts. That’s the engineering information, and the source of truth. If tables & charts don’t agree with the 1st page, then go by tables & charts.
  • When the 1st page doesn’t fully agree with tables & charts, that’s rarely an engineering error, that’s usually marketing and specsmanship.
  • > It was clarified with Texas Instruments, and what they claim is that 80MHz is applicable bandwidth for A>=2, and 45MHz is applicable for unity gain ([question on the TI forum](https://e2e.ti.com/support/amplifiers-group/amplifiers/f/amplifiers-forum/1431163/opa2211a-clarification-on-gbw)): [...]
  • I have not yet seen a definition like this, is this considered common practice?
  • I remember seeing other op-amp datasheets with different GBWP (gain-bandwidth product) specifications for different bands. I wouldn't say that it's all that common.
  • [Can't seem to find what op-amp model it was. It was a high speed op-amp with GBWP around 2 GHz. I'll add a link here when I come across it again, eventually.]
#3: Post edited by user avatar Nick Alexeev‭ · 2024-10-30T17:40:06Z (about 2 months ago)
  • The 1st page of a datasheet is written by marketing. It can still give you an idea of what the chip is about, but it often contains the performance data under the best conditions. The conditions are rarely specified on the 1st page.
  • Always check the electrical characteristics section and the charts. That’s the engineering information, and the source of truth. If tables & charts don’t agree with the 1st page, then go by tables & charts.
  • When the 1st page doesn’t fully agree with tables & charts, that’s rarely an engineering error, that’s usually marketing and specsmanchip.
  • The 1st page of a datasheet is written by marketing. It can still give you an idea of what the chip is about, but it often contains the performance data under the best conditions. The conditions are rarely specified on the 1st page.
  • Always check the electrical characteristics section and the charts. That’s the engineering information, and the source of truth. If tables & charts don’t agree with the 1st page, then go by tables & charts.
  • When the 1st page doesn’t fully agree with tables & charts, that’s rarely an engineering error, that’s usually marketing and specsmanship.
#2: Post edited by user avatar Nick Alexeev‭ · 2024-10-30T15:37:36Z (about 2 months ago)
  • The 1st page of a datasheet is written by marketing. It can still give you an idea of what the chip is about, but it often contains the performance data under the best conditions. The conditions are rarely specified on the 1st page.
  • Always check the electrical characteristics section and the charts. That’s the engineering information, and the source of truth. If tables & charts don’t agree with the 1st page, then go by tables & charts.
  • If the 1st page doesn’t fully agree with tables & charts, that’s rarely an engineering error, that’s marketing and specsmanchip.
  • The 1st page of a datasheet is written by marketing. It can still give you an idea of what the chip is about, but it often contains the performance data under the best conditions. The conditions are rarely specified on the 1st page.
  • Always check the electrical characteristics section and the charts. That’s the engineering information, and the source of truth. If tables & charts don’t agree with the 1st page, then go by tables & charts.
  • When the 1st page doesn’t fully agree with tables & charts, that’s rarely an engineering error, that’s usually marketing and specsmanchip.
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Nick Alexeev‭ · 2024-10-30T14:39:29Z (about 2 months ago)
The 1st page of a datasheet is written by marketing.  It can still give you an idea of what the chip is about, but it often contains the performance data under the best conditions.  The conditions are rarely specified on the 1st page.

Always check the electrical characteristics section and the charts.  That’s the engineering information, and the source of truth.  If tables & charts don’t agree with the 1st page, then go by tables & charts.

If the 1st page doesn’t fully agree with tables & charts, that’s rarely an engineering error, that’s marketing and specsmanchip.