Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Potential MathJax section in the formatting help

+2
−0

MathJax is enabled in this community, but it is not mentioned in the formatting help.

If MathJax guidance is wanted, there is some in the Mathematics Codidact formatting help (at the end). This could be copied as is, or a modified version could be used.

Do you want to have MathJax guidance in the Electrical Engineering formatting help?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

1 answer

+1
−0

Yes, we should add how to use MathJax to the help for this site. Unfortunately, there are several things that work against getting this done:

  1. The Codidact help system sucks! When we first started this site, I wrote a bunch of help pages, carefully designed to present information keeping both the user's context and what we need them to know before posting here in mind. Unfortunately, I could only control the entries in what is now the "Electrical Engineering Site" box. Codidact controls all the other help boxes, and worse yet, where they are placed on the page. The result is a new user is presented mostly with drivel they don't care about at first glance. The stuff we really need them to know is at the bottom. I expect most user give up before even noticing it's there.

  2. I haven't found a good but concise description of how to use MathJax yet. Everything I have found always links to elsewhere. The help on the Math site you linked to gives some information, but not much. As a result of all this, I don't know how to use MathJax (every time I've wanted to, finding the docs would have taken too long when I just wanted to write a simple equation), so I don't know how to explain it the right way.

  3. If I could arrange the EE site help page to properly present information in the right order and formatting relevant to a user, then I might be willing to spend a few hours really learning MathJax and writing a basic description. However, as long as Codidact Help has the horrible presentation it does, it's not worth my volunteer effort.

So the answer is "Great, but the Codidact help needs to be fixed first". I tried that many years ago and got nowhere, so gave up and stopped writing help pages. If you want to revisit that, post about it on main Meta.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

How do we improve it? (3 comments)

Sign up to answer this question »