Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

71%
+3 −0
Q&A Power polygon and matching ground

If it is important, how crucial is it that the polygon completely overlaps the ground plane beneath it? A power polygon can hang off the side a of a power plane. Complete overlap isn't crucia...

posted 1d ago by Nick Alexeev‭  ·  edited 1d ago by Nick Alexeev‭

Answer
#2: Post edited by user avatar Nick Alexeev‭ · 2025-02-02T20:19:09Z (1 day ago)
  • > If it is important, how crucial is it that the polygon completely overlaps the ground plane beneath it?
  • A power polygon can hang off the side a of a power plane. Complete overlap isn't crucial.
  • > [...] how significant is it that the ground plane remains continuous and is not split by traces?
  • Keep the ground plane as intact as possible. Splitting ground plane by traces leads to increased parasitic inductance of all the signals which have to run across the split. Don't "Swiss cheese" the ground plane and run signals over voids. It's more importnat for signals than for power.
  • > For power polygon that primarily carry DC, how critical is it that it is located above a ground plane?
  • Why is this even a question? : )
  • How many layers are you planning to have? These days there are too few reasons to do a 2-layer board instead of 4-layer. With a 4-layer board you'll have ground plane everywhere.
  • When a polygon overlaps the power plane on the adjacent layer, you get the benefit or power plane capacitance. The capacitance value is modest on the order of hundreds of pF per square inch. But the value of power plane capacitance is that it comes with very low equivalent series inductance (ESL).
  • As a general rule, the lower the speeds (rise times) of your signals, the less important power plane capacitance becomes for power integrity.
  • As a general [philosophical] rule "Treat power as signal."
  • > If it is important, how crucial is it that the polygon completely overlaps the ground plane beneath it?
  • A power polygon can hang off the side a of a power plane. Complete overlap isn't crucial.
  • > [...] how significant is it that the ground plane remains continuous and is not split by traces?
  • Keep the ground plane as intact as possible. Splitting ground plane by traces leads to increased parasitic inductance of all the signals which have to run across the split. Don't "Swiss cheese" the ground plane and run signals over voids. It's more importnat for signals than for power.
  • > For power polygon that primarily carry DC, how critical is it that it is located above a ground plane?
  • Why is this even a question? : )
  • How many layers are you planning to have? These days there are too few reasons to do a 2-layer board instead of 4-layer. With a 4-layer board you'll have ground plane everywhere.
  • When a power polygon overlaps the ground plane on the adjacent layer, you get the benefit or power plane capacitance. The capacitance value is small on the order of hundreds of pF per square inch. But the benefit of power plane capacitance is that it comes with very low equivalent series inductance (ESL).
  • As a general rule, the lower the speeds (rise times) of your signals, the less important power plane capacitance becomes for power integrity.
  • As a general [philosophical] rule "Treat power as signal."
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Nick Alexeev‭ · 2025-02-02T18:38:58Z (1 day ago)
> If it is important, how crucial is it that the polygon completely overlaps the ground plane beneath it?

A power polygon can hang off the side a of a power plane.  Complete overlap isn't crucial.

> [...] how significant is it that the ground plane remains continuous and is not split by traces?

Keep the ground plane as intact as possible.  Splitting ground plane by traces leads to increased parasitic inductance of all the signals which have to run across the split.  Don't "Swiss cheese" the ground plane and run signals over voids.  It's more importnat for signals than for power.

> For power polygon that primarily carry DC, how critical is it that it is located above a ground plane?

Why is this even a question?  : )  
How many layers are you planning to have?  These days there are too few reasons to do a 2-layer board instead of 4-layer.  With a 4-layer board you'll have ground plane everywhere.

When a polygon overlaps the power plane on the adjacent layer, you get the benefit or power plane capacitance.  The capacitance value is modest on the order of hundreds of pF per square inch.  But the value of power plane capacitance is that it comes with very low equivalent series inductance (ESL).

As a general rule, the lower the speeds (rise times) of your signals, the less important power plane capacitance becomes for power integrity.

As a general [philosophical] rule "Treat power as signal."