Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

50%
+1 −1
Q&A Changing PCB trace width once signal-to-noise ratio is high

None of these ideas optimize the SNR that you need. You need to design with error correction or (suppression); 50V/m grid E-field (Right Led Drive RLD) >100 dB suppression AM radio noise (...

posted 27d ago by TonyStewart‭  ·  edited 27d ago by TonyStewart‭

Answer
#2: Post edited by user avatar TonyStewart‭ · 2025-03-03T22:07:19Z (27 days ago)
  • None of these ideas optimize the SNR that you need.
  • You need to design with error correction or (suppression);
  • - 50V/m grid E-field (Right Led Drive RLD) >100 dB suppression
  • - AM radio noise (LPF > -40dB @ 1MHz)
  • - Galvanic skin response (motion artifacts) (firm electrode strain relief)
  • If you search for front-ends on EKG/ECG/EMG solutions you will find the best use the common-mode signal fed back to create a CM gnd somewhere on the body not moving much, away from the sensors. This becomes your signal ground but using good medical* isolated supplies or batteries will not conduct much (uA) current. *=low leakage rated/approved.
  • This can be done with a single supply using an INA if you choose the best Vref just below V+/2. You will never get 120 dB CMRR if you use 1% passives in the front-end and you net a 1% DM/CM error that's a 20 dB CMRR. This is why INA's are used with laser-trimmed errors.
  • ![Image_alt_text](https://electrical.codidact.com/uploads/lwf9wo02t82vs5abw1hcu9wcopbu) https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Chusak-Thanawattano/publication/261229670_Wearable_wireless_ECG_sensor_with_cross-platform_real-time_monitoring/links/566a430008ae62b05f0296c5/Wearable-wireless-ECG-sensor-with-cross-platform-real-time-monitoring.pdf
  • --------------------------
  • ![Image_alt_text](https://electrical.codidact.com/uploads/afsbih6dffs2eywdt9btar182v4j) https://www.analog.com/en/resources/analog-dialogue/articles/ecg-front-end-design-simplified.html
  • None of these ideas optimize the SNR that you need.
  • You need to design with error correction or (suppression);
  • - 50V/m grid E-field (Right Led Drive RLD) >100 dB suppression
  • - AM radio noise (LPF > -40dB @ 1MHz)
  • - Galvanic skin response (motion artifacts) (firm electrode strain relief)
  • If you search for front-ends on EKG/ECG/EMG solutions you will find the best use the common-mode signal fed back to create a CM gnd somewhere on the body not moving much, away from the sensors. This becomes your signal ground but using good medical* isolated supplies or batteries will not conduct much (uA) current. *=low leakage rated/approved.
  • This can be done with a single supply using an INA ensuring that Vref is near V+/2.
  • You will never get 120 dB CMRR if you use 1% passives in the front-end and you net a 1% DM/CM error that's a 20 dB CMRR. This is why INA's are used with laser-trimmed errors.
  • ![Image_alt_text](https://electrical.codidact.com/uploads/lwf9wo02t82vs5abw1hcu9wcopbu) https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Chusak-Thanawattano/publication/261229670_Wearable_wireless_ECG_sensor_with_cross-platform_real-time_monitoring/links/566a430008ae62b05f0296c5/Wearable-wireless-ECG-sensor-with-cross-platform-real-time-monitoring.pdf
  • --------------------------
  • ![Image_alt_text](https://electrical.codidact.com/uploads/afsbih6dffs2eywdt9btar182v4j) https://www.analog.com/en/resources/analog-dialogue/articles/ecg-front-end-design-simplified.html
#1: Initial revision by user avatar TonyStewart‭ · 2025-03-03T22:05:00Z (27 days ago)
None of these ideas optimize the SNR that you need.

You need to design with error correction or (suppression);

- 50V/m grid E-field (Right Led Drive RLD) >100 dB suppression
- AM radio noise  (LPF > -40dB @ 1MHz)
- Galvanic skin response (motion artifacts) (firm electrode strain relief)

If you search for front-ends on EKG/ECG/EMG solutions you will find the best use the common-mode signal fed back to create a CM gnd somewhere on the body not moving much, away from the sensors. This becomes your signal ground but using good medical* isolated supplies or batteries will not conduct much (uA) current. *=low leakage rated/approved.

This can be done with a single supply using an INA if you choose the best Vref just below V+/2. You will never get 120 dB CMRR if you use 1% passives in the front-end and you net a 1% DM/CM error that's a 20 dB CMRR.  This is why INA's are used with laser-trimmed errors.

![Image_alt_text](https://electrical.codidact.com/uploads/lwf9wo02t82vs5abw1hcu9wcopbu)  https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Chusak-Thanawattano/publication/261229670_Wearable_wireless_ECG_sensor_with_cross-platform_real-time_monitoring/links/566a430008ae62b05f0296c5/Wearable-wireless-ECG-sensor-with-cross-platform-real-time-monitoring.pdf
    
--------------------------
![Image_alt_text](https://electrical.codidact.com/uploads/afsbih6dffs2eywdt9btar182v4j) https://www.analog.com/en/resources/analog-dialogue/articles/ecg-front-end-design-simplified.html