Mark all as read

Microwave oven interfering with WiFi on the 2.4GHz band


As I understand it, microwave oven magnetrons operate at 2.45GHz, which is an unlicensed band in most of the world. When 2.4GHz technologies such as WiFi (802.11), Bluetooth and Zigbee were launched, there were concerns that these would collide with microwave oven frequences. I remember a very early (year 2000-ish) Bluetooth evaluation project where I amused myself by placing two Bluetooth modules on each side of a running microwave oven and couldn't get any form of Bluetooth traffic working.

But are microwave ovens really allowed to cause interference at longer distances, such as jamming out WiFi located in the same room or building? My take is that they should count as non-specific SRD (short range device). I'm located in Europe, so in that case the 2400-2450MHz unlicenced, harmonised band should apply - this is standardized by the European Radiocommunications Committee within the whole of EU. If so the SRD standard EN/ETSI 300 440 for non-specific SRD (sorting under the new RED directive) should apply. Is this correct so far? Or do microwave ovens have their own specific technical standard?

ETSI standards are conveniently available for free, so I checked v.2.1.1 of EN/ETSI 300 440. Chapter regarding limits of unwanted emissions in the spurious domain are limited to 1uW for frequencies > 1 GHz. I'm assuming this is 1uW E.R.P, so roughly -30dBm E.R.P. The spurious domain is defined in complex ways by this standard depending on bandwidth from carrier. I don't think a device that disturbs with -30dBm E.R.P. would affect WiFi or any other radio technology much at all. Or would it? Would the "listen before talk" RSSI limit of WiFi cause any problems here?

Could any radiated emission from a microwave be regarded as an intentional radiator? Does it have a designated carrier and occupied band, where it may act just as any other SRD? I'm assuming that the microwave oven occupied band is very wide, several 100MHz.

If so, then what happens when the microwave occupied band (+/- x MHz from carrier) collides with the WiFi occupied band? There are a couple of (European) WiFi channels that overlap with 2.45GHz specifically. Since WiFi (and Bluetooth) use spread spectrum technologies, would that mean that WiFi skips certain channels, resulting in reduced bandwidth?

Why should this post be closed?

1 comment

I came across an interesting, detailed paper here. So apparently microwave ovens sort under a specialized directive 2013/35/EU in the EU and also under specialized FCC Part 18 in USA. Lundin‭ 26 days ago

2 answers


Microwave Materials, Spectrum then EMI effects on SNR of WiFi, BT.

There are a lot of measurable parameters in microwave dielectrics which affect;

  • Dielectric Constant , Dk between conductors and thus Impedance , Zo
  • scattering parameters in a transmission path from mismatch and losses
  • skin depth: compare wavelength of IR vs uWave
    • Longer λ is better for skin effects but worse for loss tangent
    • Microwave Ovens:
      • Consumer: f= 2.45GHz +/-100~120Hz sidebands λ=12.2cm, P=1.8kW max
      • Commercial: 915 MHz +/-100~120Hz sidebands λ=32.8 cm, P=3kW max+3kW IR(opt.) The modulation sidebands depends on power line frequency (doubled with many harmonics) Then there are SIGNIFICANT 1/4 λ sidebands typ 300MHz due to the geometry of standing waves in the chamber but again modulated with power line harmonics and not high bit rates. The spectrum will show quasi-peaks and not modulation and the modulation is dispersed at low f by the rotating turntable and contents reflecting off the oven walls.
  • compare this with WiFi: including but not limited to 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, 6 GHz, and 60 GHz frequency bands with frequency hopping within a BW of 10 MHz, 20, 40 , 80MHz etc which is rather immune to 2.45GHz in a narrow band unless the front end is compressing with WiFi signal <= -78 dB and Rician Fading loss of 10dB

Test the SNR on a Laptop with a strong signal -70dBm and a weak signal-80dBm which is borderline on 54Mbps but OK on 11Mbps. Then put near a microwave oven and look for LOS (loss of signal). There are many windows tools to convert RSSI (received signal Indicator to dBm) for any WiFi signal on a Laptop or Mobile.

Contamination is more critical for interference, e.g. acid rain, snow on Sat dish, body reflecting/blocking antenna.

  • Loss Tangent is the critical factor in a dielectric that absorbs power (heat) and the high dielectric constant (Dk=80) lowers the impedance by a factor of 80 but does not mean it is more lossy but can conduct more current in series with the cycling waves.

Oil, plastic and fat have a Dk around 4. The presence of contaminants and additives in FR4 makes it a poor dielectric for microwave with the exception of special blends of epoxy/fiberglass such as GETEK and others use more polyamide which affects cost a bit but reduces the loss tangent enough for use in the ISM (928MHz) and 2.4GHz bands at a 10% cost increase of the PCB.

Experiment DIY

This means de-ionized, sodium-free pure water does not heat up quickly in a microwave oven.

The presence of salt in any dielectric is an ion that makes it significantly more conductive. Test a glass of clean water and one with a tbsp of salt after 60 secs for temp rise. BIG difference in temp rise ('C only not 'F no exceptions for Engineers even in the Excited States).

That is Loss Tangent loss due to ionic impurities.


I have measured RSSI accurately to 0.1dB for loss of signal and BER on WiFI extensively in the past, but not now. When 54Mbps fails, 11Mbps works and near threshold 1dB rise in SNR is huge ~2 orders of magnitude difference in BER vs 1dB rise SNR. The Laptop antenna motion of <1mm in rotational angle aiming for a reflection, can easily change 1 to 10 dB from multipath when the range is far.

I do have an E/H Field Strength meter but it is not frequency selective up to 5GHz so I could not test this and my 10yr old laptop power connector is dead (solder joint) so I could not make measurements, but my own experience is Rician Fading is alot more serious (>-10dB) on weak signals from body / wall reflections out of phase than the effect of a microwave oven affecting the Wifi/BT radio if well designed.

The Physics of water like any dielectric don't have a microwave resonant frequency The absorptive effects have been characterized from 10cm to 10um rise with lower wavelength but this is enhanced by salt ions.

@Olin's assertion to resonant frequency is totally bogus. Water has absorptive properties over many decades of f without this resonance.

Conclusion This is a good reference but fails to discuss the ionic behaviors of contaminants but clearly agrees with my assertion that there is no interference.


IF you are an experienced EE and down vote this without comments you are in contempt of your own ego issue and have no business here. TonyStewart‭ 11 days ago

Interesting answer, thanks. I don't understand why this was down-voted either. Lundin‭ 11 days ago

@Lundin. Low value added readers who fail to communicate and downvote are called Trolls TonyStewart‭ 9 days ago


Microwave ovens work on the frequency they do because that's one of the main resonant frequencies of water molecules. The radiation excites water molecules, which then transfer some of their extra energy to other surrounding molecules.

No, microwave ovens are not intentional radiators, at least not in the legal sense here in the US. Yes, they use radiation internally, but there is not purpose or intent of that radiation getting outside the unit. So unless there is a specific exemption for microwave ovens in the law (haven't checked), they have to comply with the same maximum radiation limits any other device does. I don't have time right now, but maybe later I'll look the applicable FCC part 15 rules and see what that radiation limit is and exactly how it is defined.


From a very cursory look, it seems like a home microwave oven in the United States is not allowed to produce external radiation exceeding 500 µV/m at a distance of 3 m at the microwave frequency.


I read some loose rumour on the net about FCC having a special rule for microwave ovens, something about allowing 5mW in the near field, no idea if that's true (and I can't find anything about a similar rule in Europe either). However FCC part 15 generally allows a carrier of ~0.75mW ERP for short range devices on most licence free bands. I don't remember the exact number, it's likely expressed in dBuV/m or some tricky unit like that. Lundin‭ about 1 month ago

Bit of research about the equivalent rules in the US. claims that "these devices fall under the FCC rules 47 CFR Part 18". I'm not quite able to weed out which parts of Part 18 that are applicable though, §18.305 speaks of field strength of emissions for "Induction cooking ranges" and says 300uV/m (30m). If that's the applicable rule, then they are allowed to leak a very low field strength. Which seems unlikely to affect WiFi. Lundin‭ about 1 month ago

That is, assuming that the oven and WiFi router both have FCC approval. Which I wouldn't automatically assume to be the case, some may just have "Ali Baba approval". Lundin‭ about 1 month ago

Microwave ovens operate by dielectric heating of water and fats. The 2.4GHz operating frequency has nothing to do with water molecule resonance - in fact "industrial" microwave ovens often operate at around 900MHz. Bruce Hansen‭ 20 days ago

false assumption on resonant frequency of water. -1 TonyStewart‭ 11 days ago

Show 2 more comments

Sign up to answer this question »