Activity for mavavilj
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edit | Post #292602 |
Post edited: |
— | about 1 month ago |
| Edit | Post #292602 | Initial revision | — | about 1 month ago |
| Question | — |
Is it possible to build a passive many hosts to a single disk SATA splitter? I don't find any of such cables, and the discussions on the web revolve around SATA being point-to-point and not designed for networked or shared storage. However, if one'd build a cable that is just a passive Y cable where only one computer accesses a disk at a time, then is there a technical rea... (more) |
— | about 1 month ago |
| Comment | Post #292309 |
Okay so you conclude that since it's a modified design, then it very likely has to be checked for compliance? (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292235 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292378 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292378 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292378 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292378 | Initial revision | — | about 2 months ago |
| Question | — |
What are closest free or low-cost alternatives to software like Ansys PCB modelling? What are closest free or low-cost alternatives to software like Ansys PCB modelling? https://www.ansys.com/blog/optimize-your-pcb It's too costly for study purposes. To clarify: I am looking for a program or a software framework (e.g. C/C++) that is free (e.g. GPL/MIT) and can do PCB anal... (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292235 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292235 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292235 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292247 |
But why aren't the laptop's antennas so low-power that moving them around does not change anything substantial? (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292235 |
Slabtop modifications are usually one-off modifications. But the question is maybe about how serious such modification really is. It could be that the antennas would be so low-power that moving them around does not change anything substantially. (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292235 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292235 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292235 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292235 |
Post edited: |
— | 2 months ago |
| Comment | Post #292235 |
Yes, I thought so, but does it apply to the housing of the antennas too? So the 3D printed example for the Macbook Pro would be out-of-spec? What about figuring out what replacement external antennas to fit to the Wi-Fi card's Ipex connectors, while staying within the certification? The certification... (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
| Edit | Post #292235 | Initial revision | — | 2 months ago |
| Question | — |
Do hobbyist slabtop Wi-Fi modifications need to consult FCC regulations? Do I need to consult FCC regulations in order to modify a laptop's internal WI-FI antennas to a new housing? This is quite common when modifying laptops to "slabtops". For example, one could 3D print this sort of housing, and the place the IPEX-connected antennas in there: https://www.printable... (more) |
— | 2 months ago |