Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on Electrochemical Front End do we need dual voltage rails and split ground

Post

Electrochemical Front End do we need dual voltage rails and split ground

+1
−0

I am using AD5941 for my measurements from different sensors.I will be making a breakout board such that in my board I will be providing pads for connecting the sensors and the output of AD5941 will be connected to STM32 board.

Image_alt_text

The power requirements of AD5941 is given below.

Image_alt_text

I checked the reference design provided in their website.AVDD (3.3V) is generated in the board with the help of a voltage regulator and DVDD (3.3V) is coming from an Arduino board and also the digital ground of AD5941(DGND) is Arduino ground.

Image_alt_text

I am planning to provide a single 3.3V for my AVDD and DVDD also the board will have only one ground.I won't be splitting as digital and analog grounds.

May I know will this cause any issues in my board?

Also what do you think,why analog devices reference design they provided split ground and different power supply for Analog and digital domain.

From my literature study what I understood is split ground is not a good idea.

If I am using only one ground plane,in that case do I need to use separate regualtors for AVDD and DVDD?

The layout from AD refrence design is given below.

TOP SIDE:

Image_alt_text

BOTTOM SIDE:

Image_alt_text

History

1 comment thread

IOVDD range for AD5941. Is it just a sloppy datasheet, or is there more to it? (2 comments)
IOVDD range for AD5941. Is it just a sloppy datasheet, or is there more to it?
Nick Alexeev‭ wrote about 1 year ago

The Table 1 in the specifications (electrical characteristics) say that IOVDD should be between 1.62V and 1.98V . That’s surprising, because the I/O voltage range is usually higher or broader than the core digital voltage range (DVDD in this case). Other parts of the datasheet mention including the header of the Table 1 on other pages mention “IOVDD = 1.8 V ± 10% and 2.8 V to 3.6 V” [emphasis mine, N.A.] .

newbie‭ wrote about 1 year ago

In the reference design IOVDD is shorted to DVDD(3.3V)