Comments on Is there a way to reliably measure antenna return loss outside a lab?
Parent
Is there a way to reliably measure antenna return loss outside a lab?
Assume I'm a complete beginner at RF.
Is there a way to measure return loss of an antenna, in such a manner that I can reliably reproduce the measurement later on?
What I'm talking about is producing the antenna characteristic graph to show what frequency it was adapted to and how wide it is. That is, the classic frequency vs dBm graph with a dip at the expected center frequency.
I've never quite managed to do this in a satisfying manner. I can do it in two ways, either the manual way which involves using a spectrum analyser with tracking generator and a 50ohm directional coupler. I connect the tracking generator to the input of the directional coupler, then measure how much energy that bounces back. I also have access to an antenna measurement instrument that does all of this automatically.
Using either method, I get a graph that looks somewhat correct. The antennas are typically either 433MHz or 902MHz 0 gain omnidirectional with a width of +-/50MHz from center at most.
However, if I nudge the setup and place the antenna slightly differently, or just leave it and do it again another day, the energy dip can move some +/-30MHz. I've tried to use a fixture so that the antenna sits mounted & grounded the same way every time, but still there's considerable variations.
I'm not using any signal damper, could that be a problem? Am I wrong thinking the spec should be able to deal with its own tracking generator?
Or am I naive to think I can do this accurately outside a lab? Will EMI really affect measurements that much?
Post
The RSSI detector in the receiver is the best field tool. In Windows I had a tool (Wifi Radar?) that read the Broadcom IC RSSI and displayed a time plot of the results as I changed laptop orientation a couple of degrees and the results might change from -74 to -84 dBm and result in occasional errors at 54 Mbps.
The 2nd best tool is a 3dB splitter to measure the return peak voltage with a diode and DMM but requires calibration.
- When I was doing the same in ‘77 I found that the return loss was depending on people walking into the lab and thought I had just invented a remote intrusion alarm from the reflected waves at multiple wavelengths. This was after tuning the antenna for RL>20 dB so the directional coupler was very sensitive. It simply used a Schottky diode on the return path to a DMM to measure the reflected wave after calibration with lab equipment. You could use a stripline directional coupler or a hybrid 3 dB splitter or anything direction to measure return loss for tuning to a minimum.
You can also have a thermal sensitivity problem as well as a sensitivity to the shift in effective wavelength from reflections.
3 comment threads