Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Comments on What are the guidelines for porting one's answers from ElectricalEngineering.SE, if any?

Parent

What are the guidelines for porting one's answers from ElectricalEngineering.SE, if any?

+3
−0

I've noticed that in the edit account section there is a (inactive) link to one's content on a StackExchange site.

This made me wonder if it is appropriate to transfer some content from EE.SE manually.

I have quite a bunch of good answers there and I'd like to "migrate" them here, perhaps after a bit of editing, depending on the question to which I was answering (I'd probably need to make up a new question because some of my good answers were to somewhat incomplete or foggy questions).

Therefore I'm asking:

  1. Is it acceptable to "port" one's answers from EE.SE?

  2. Is there some guidelines to do that, especially regarding creating a matching question, either because the OP was not too good or to avoid "stealing" the work of the person who wrote it?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+3
−0

Sorry I didn't notice this earlier.

We definitely don't just want to import questions and answers directly from SE. This has been discussed several times on various Codidact sites. Some of the first few Codidact sites did mass-import from SE, and that didn't go very well. Those sites are doing particularly poorly. One possibility is that search engines downgrade a site when it has significant duplicate content of another.

It can be OK to carefully and selectively import a few of your best posts from SE. I did some of that to get this site going over a year ago now, but have not done so recently, and don't plan to. This concept was discussed on the Writing site a while back, and my answer there applies just as well here.

Some points to consider:

  1. Don't get caught in the sunk cost fallacy. Yes, you did some work elsewhere, and may feel justifiably proud of it. But, that was in another place at another time. We are building this site from scratch. What you did someone else doesn't give you any points here. Try to focus on creating new original content here.
  2. Please don't bring over anything but your own content. If it requires a disclaimer, we don't want it. Disclaimers advertise the site the content came from.
  3. If your own content doesn't make sense without someone else's (like an answer to someone else's question), re-write the other content in your own words. Bring over the thoughts (if you must), but definitely don't bring over someone else's words.
  4. If you do bring over your own content from elsewhere, make it better here than there. There is always something to fix, word better, add, etc. We want to be better than elsewhere. Obviously that's not possibly by copying content from elsewhere.
History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

I agree that bulk-importing all my content from EESE is not a good thing. Something is too specific t... (3 comments)
I agree that bulk-importing all my content from EESE is not a good thing. Something is too specific t...
Lorenzo Donati‭ wrote almost 3 years ago · edited almost 3 years ago

I agree that bulk-importing all my content from EESE is not a good thing. Something is too specific to the original question, which is too specific as well, and something would require too much work to adapt. So I already intended to only migrate only select answers.

Note that my plan already was not to import the OP question, but to make up an ad-hoc question to match my would-be answer.

Lorenzo Donati‭ wrote almost 3 years ago · edited almost 3 years ago

Your points 2, 3 and 4 are really about what I intended to do. The disclaimer I planned to insert have the purpose to avoid people finding the answer on EESE and thinking that I plagiarized that content. Even if it was really mine, I bet that many people won't check the name of the poster (even if I post here with the same name and avatar) and would flag my answer here as plagiarism.

Lorenzo Donati‭ wrote almost 3 years ago

I'm not convinced that citing EESE would be so harmful (note that I'm not going to link to the original answer). It's highly probable that someone searching the web would find EESE answers first, so I don't think we do them any favor by stating their name.

On the contrary, it may also mildly make a "subliminal" connection between CoDidact and SE. After all halo effect in marketing and psychology is a thing. And EESE, with all its limitation, is still perceived as a quality content source.