Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Comments on Creating an "Insights" category

Post

Creating an "Insights" category

+0
−1

Looking at the "papers" category, I found that several papers do not fit the very purpose of this category (that's the reason I've not upvoted them). Nevertheless, they are relatively well written, well thought out, and probably interesting for new comers in electronics. I think for example most of the papers of Circuit fantasist deserve more upvotes, but this does not happen because they are not really relevant to the "paper" category, according to the expectations there (in my opinion).

What is lacking is an "Insights" category, whose characteristics could be discussed here. This category could include interesting views of well known topics, experiments that demonstrate (in an original manner) some known facts, good student tricks, pedagogy insights etc.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

2 comment threads

Resources? (3 comments)
Seems like Papers but lower the bar? (2 comments)
Seems like Papers but lower the bar?
Lundin‭ wrote almost 3 years ago

So it seems that this would be like Papers but lower the bar of what's expected? Maybe "Articles" would be a good name? Since that implies something that might get printed in a journal but not necessarily a full scientific study, which is what I think of when I hear "Papers".

coquelicot‭ wrote almost 3 years ago · edited almost 3 years ago

I think your suggestion is of the same order as that of Monica in the previous thread: to change the name of the current category, in order to lower and extend the expectations (actually Monica suggested to change the name of the new proposed category). As I wrote in the answer to Olin, the level of the articles can be lowered and the scope of the category extended in one or other way; the name of the category is only a cosmetic detail. I think this would be a wrong choice though, because the "papers" category as defined is good and interesting. The main point is that it is now full of articles that does not correspond to the expectations: think about a newcomer that want to read about original methods and tricks of decent EE level, he looks at the titles of the articles, opens some of them and discovers that they are low level EE stories or insights for beginners in electronics. That's confusing and not very appealing.