Is the distinction between "papers" (implying research, along the lines of what one might submit to a journal or conference) and general-purpose resources/articles/teaching? Another community uses "resources" as the category name for the latter, in case that helps. I don't know how clear "insights" would be to somebody just browsing names looking for things to read.

Hello Monica. Your suggestion is interesting, and I have personally no objection to call this category resources in place of insights (I should even add that I like this suggestion). This would indeed allow even broader articles to be added. Anyway, I think that's only a cosmetic detail, not the main point. Please, see my answer to Lundin in the thread below.

Thanks coquelicot‭. I'm not a domain expert, nor even qualified to participate in the main areas of this community; I monitor all the community metas to see if there are places where I can help with information, but I'm not trying to argue for a particular outcome here. I agree that the name is less important than the scope of each category; I asked about the name to see if I understood the scope distinction you're making. Thanks.