Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on Circuit for earth conductor presence detection

Parent

Circuit for earth conductor presence detection

+3
−0

Reading a Tesla Wall Adapter installation manual , their brand of an AC EV charger, chapter about “Ground Assurance” and here is the quote from there: Quote from Tesla Wall adapter

Although the equipment can work with L1 and L2 connected only, because of the safety reason I assume they require Earth terminal of the charger to be grounded as well with the ability to monitor it(apparently).

Mostly referring to the US power grid where L1 and L2 are taken out from the split phase transformer with neutral grounded at one place in the system.

How the circuitry for something like that conceptually look like?

I was thinking about inducing DC current into the ground, small enough in value to not trip the RCD and measure the voltage drop in the ground/earth itself(I guess??) - current source and shunt for voltage sensing? Wondering if inducing any additional resistance(shunt) in series with earth is legal?

For what is worth their input power terminals are: L1, L2, and PE - there is no additional I/O solely for this function to work.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+1
−0

The section you quoted says: "by injecting a small amount of current into the ground".

With a solid ground connection, the voltage on their ground pin shouldn't change no matter what current is injected onto it. If they inject a current and see a resulting voltage change, then they know the ground connection is not solid.

The question then becomes voltage change relative to what? I have no special knowledge about their circuit, but if I was faced with this, I'd probably generated an "average" voltage from the two hot phases. I'd filter that to get rid of the power line frequency and give it time to settle. Now you have an internal voltage that shouldn't be changing relative to the ground connection. You can inject short pulses of a few mA and a few 10s or 100s of µs and verify that you don't get corresponding changes in the difference between your internal reference voltage and the ground connection.

I expect a lot of noise, so I'd probably do these pulses regularly and synchronously measure the voltage difference. I'd then get a filtered value of difference with pulse on and difference with pulse off, and compare the two. If you continually do pulses, like 10 µs on, 10 µs off, then after a few line cycles I'd expect you get a good enough signal.

Again, this is all speculation. I don't know how they are actually doing it, and I haven't tried this. There are probably some gotchas you discover as you try to implement something like this.

"You can inject short pulses of a few mA and a few 10s or 100s of µs and verify that you don't get corresponding changes in the difference between your internal reference voltage and the ground connection."

From the "recreated neutral" point?

No, specifically NOT that. That generated neutral is a signal that has very limited current capability. And, in the ideal case, it has the same potential as ground, so you can't easily cause it to dump current onto the ground.

Surely there is already rectified power from the two line phases available in the system somewhere. I'd use that to source the few mA to inject onto the ground.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

Injecting short pulses (2 comments)
Injecting short pulses
2kind‭ wrote 4 months ago

"You can inject short pulses of a few mA and a few 10s or 100s of µs and verify that you don't get corresponding changes in the difference between your internal reference voltage and the ground connection."

From the "recreated neutral" point?

TonyStewart‭ wrote 3 months ago

It ought to be a continuous test for PE gnd like an RCD at these power levels for car & human safety.

Ground is just 0V in theory a local reference point regardless if it is floating like earth.