Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Complementary transistor pairs - what is the point ?

+2
−0

I understand that some applications require NPN-PNP pairs with identical electrical characteristics. But I would like to understand why.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (1 comment)

2 answers

You are accessing this answer with a direct link, so it's being shown above all other answers regardless of its score. You can return to the normal view.

+3
−0

You generally want complementary NPN/PNP pairs when they are used as opposites of each other in the same circuit. One transistor is usually used with opposite polarity as a mirror image of the other.

For example, consider this circuit:

Image

Q1 drives the output during the positive half of the waveform and Q2 during the negative. Clearly the requirements on each transistor are the same. If you were to put a sine wave in, you'd want the top and bottom halves of the output to be mirror images of each other. This means that not only will the two transistors be subjected to the same voltages and currents, but it is also useful for them to have the same gain and other characteristics.

Manufacturers know this, so often explicitly say that a particular pair of models are "complementary" of each other. Not only does that save digging thru datasheets looking for two that have close to the same specs, but you also know that the manufacturer deliberately intends them to have the same specs.

Of course the flip side of this is that well-designed circuits are reasonably tolerant of variations in parameters like gain. Note that in the above circuit, R1 and R2 reduce how much the overall transfer function depends on gain. Still there will be some dependency, and having both halves of the circuit respond equal and opposite of each other remains useful.

If you can cite other configurations that need complementary pairs, I'm interested to know

As I said above, you generally want complementary pairs when each transistor is half the circuit, and they are operating as mirror images of each other.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

2 comment threads

@#36396 Just a curiosity: what's the software you use for the schematics you post? They are quite nea... (2 comments)
General comments (1 comment)
+3
−0

To understand why complementary pairs are used, it's probably a good idea to think about the limitations of the NPN emitter-follower circuit: -

Image alt text

It's a good circuit for delivering modest powers to a load but its main disadvantage is that it dissipates excessive power in the emitter resistor. Hence, the emitter resistor is replaced by a PNP emitter-follower stage: -

Image alt text

This is a simplified diagram that doesn't show the required biasing arrangement on both bases but, because the PNP transistor is an active device, its ability to pull the output down when required or remain quite high impedance when the loading is light reduces power dissipation considerably.

The two devices are matched on power, current and voltage ratings. These are the important 1st parameters. Secondary to this is matching the hFE (beta or current gain) of both transistors. Given that most push-pull circuits of this type are used within a regime of negative feedback, some of the more esoteric parameters needn't be so well matched because feedback will compensate most shortcomings.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »