Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

How to treat data communication questions?

+8
−0

This question here about the OSI model was closed as off-topic. How should we treat questions about data communication?

What is definitely on-topic here:

  • Embedded systems programming, including microcontrollers and FPGA.
  • Specific software or hardware questions about industry standard buses like SPI, I2C, UART etc.
  • Hardware questions about fibre optics, copper wiring, connectors.

What might be borderland on-topic (and possibly overlap with other Codidact sites):

  • Abstract data communication questions.
  • Data communication protocol specifications.
  • Higher layer questions regarding LAN or Wifi networks.
  • The Internet protocol suite.
History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

3 answers

+3
−1

I agree that the particular question was correctly closed. Questions about protocol stacks aren't necessarily off topic. However, this one was because nothing about it had anything to do with electronics or low level embedded systems.


Where should I ask it then?

I don't know. That's not our problem here. Of the Codidact sites, the only one where it has a chance of being on-topic is Software Development as far as I can tell. You'd have to read their help carefully to check that yourself before posting.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

2 comment threads

GENERAL (2 comments)
I disagree (1 comment)
+4
−4

I think these kind of abstract/big picture data communication questions should be on-topic here. Such as the mentioned question about the OSI model.

I've been actively pushing for software.codidact.com not to accept embedded systems questions and refer such questions to this site instead, so that we don't end up with the same unfortunate overlap that SE had.

This initiative has so far been well-received and so embedded systems questions are currently listed as off-topic on software.codidact.com. And data communication is rather intimately connected with embedded systems, so it would be awkward not to accept such questions here, as long as they have some design or engineering aspect.

Things like network administration and Internet Protocol Suite application tiers probably don't belong here though. They are more suited for either powerusers.codidact.com or software.codidact.com.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

+0
−3

I may be a little bit biased on this one because it was my question which started this thread but :

I don't think data communication question should be generally off-topic because it evolves binary logic and the way the data are sent/received is through electric signals.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

Too broad a reason (1 comment)

Sign up to answer this question »