Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

71%
+3 −0
Q&A H(jω) does not exist for unstable systems, but we still use it when designing controllers - contradiction?

According to Signal processing and linear systems by Lathi, the transfer function $H(j\omega)$ does not exist for systems with poles in the RHP: - This makes sense to me, since $H(j\omega) = \fr...

3 answers  ·  posted 3y ago by Carl‭  ·  edited 1y ago by Lorenzo Donati‭

#4: Post edited by user avatar Lorenzo Donati‭ · 2023-08-12T13:30:33Z (over 1 year ago)
Retagged.
#3: Post edited by user avatar Canina‭ · 2022-02-01T09:07:55Z (almost 3 years ago)
  • H(jw) does not exist for unstable systems, but we still use it when designing controllers - contradiction?
  • H(jω) does not exist for unstable systems, but we still use it when designing controllers - contradiction?
According to _Signal processing and linear systems_ by Lathi, the transfer function \$H(j\omega)\$ does not exist for systems with poles in the RHP: -

![Lathi](https://electrical.codidact.com/uploads/GaNJKtJSqPBD9L9uzwprts6Z)

This makes sense to me, since \$H(j\omega) = \frac{Y(j\omega)}{X(j\omega)} \$. However, since the system is unstable \$Y \$ is unbounded (and growing) and the fourier transform doesn't exist for such functions. So \$Y(j\omega)\$ doesn't exist and therefore, \$H(j\omega) \$ must be meaningless for unstable systems.

BUT! we use \$H(j\omega) \$ when designing controllers for unstable systems anyway - and it works. We look at the Bode Plot, we look at the Nyquist Plot both of which you need to know \$H(j\omega)\$ and design a controller based on what we see - and the controller actually works! 

How can this be? How can there be this contradiction between systems and signals theory and control theory? It seems that concepts like **region of convergence** and **existence of fourier integral** are only dealt with on coursework and once that's done, you don't hear from them ever again.
#2: Post edited by user avatar Carl‭ · 2022-02-01T08:37:01Z (almost 3 years ago)
  • \$H(j\omega)\$ does not exist for unstable systems, but we still use it when designing controllers - contradiction?
  • H(jw) does not exist for unstable systems, but we still use it when designing controllers - contradiction?
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Carl‭ · 2022-02-01T08:35:55Z (almost 3 years ago)
\$H(j\omega)\$ does not exist for unstable systems, but we still use it when designing controllers - contradiction?
According to _Signal processing and linear systems_ by Lathi, the transfer function \$H(j\omega)\$ does not exist for systems with poles in the RHP: -

![Lathi](https://electrical.codidact.com/uploads/GaNJKtJSqPBD9L9uzwprts6Z)

This makes sense to me, since \$H(j\omega) = \frac{Y(j\omega)}{X(j\omega)} \$. However, since the system is unstable \$Y \$ is unbounded (and growing) and the fourier transform doesn't exist for such functions. So \$Y(j\omega)\$ doesn't exist and therefore, \$H(j\omega) \$ must be meaningless for unstable systems.

BUT! we use \$H(j\omega) \$ when designing controllers for unstable systems anyway - and it works. We look at the Bode Plot, we look at the Nyquist Plot both of which you need to know \$H(j\omega)\$ and design a controller based on what we see - and the controller actually works! 

How can this be? How can there be this contradiction between systems and signals theory and control theory? It seems that concepts like **region of convergence** and **existence of fourier integral** are only dealt with on coursework and once that's done, you don't hear from them ever again.