Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

71%
+3 −0
Q&A Unexpected impedance spike when paralleling capacitors

Around the 19 min mark in the video (approximately, found with hovering the cursor over the timeline) you'll see that different capacitors have different values of both capacitances and parasitics,...

posted 2y ago by a concerned citizen‭

Answer
#1: Initial revision by user avatar a concerned citizen‭ · 2022-06-02T13:36:40Z (almost 2 years ago)
Around the 19 min mark in the video (approximately, found with hovering the cursor over the timeline) you'll see that different capacitors have different values of both capacitances and parasitics, and their combined response causes those peaks. Not lastly, there are PCB traces that come with both their characteristic impedance, and parasitics. It may be more intuitive to use a SPICE program to simulate a possible setup. Everything may look something like this:

![quick SPICE test](https://electrical.codidact.com/uploads/Xv4kmZzCorqyaT6X59MmzwsQ)

I've used some fairly sensible values: a slightly larger, but short trace from the "supply (`V1`) to the PCB, tightly placed capacitors with some common values for the parasitics.

If you want a mathematical analysis then feel free to go for it, but I'll warn you you'd be getting with a very fluffy expression, which is likely to obscure things, rather than not. That's why the picture above should be slightly better, and the video even more.