Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

OPA2211 datasheet error

+2
−0

Looking at Texas Instruments opamp OPA2211it mentions GBW of 80MHz at a gain of 100, and 45MHz at gain of 1:

screenshot of the 1st page of a datasheet

Looking at the bandwidth graph from Figure 10 in datasheet: chart

It looks like 80MHz is unity gain bandwidth, and at a gain of 100 the bandwidth is around 800kHz as would be expected. I could not find any errata or other posts on forums about this. Is this just a datasheet mistake?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

3 answers

You are accessing this answer with a direct link, so it's being shown above all other answers regardless of its score. You can return to the normal view.

+1
−0

It was clarified with Texas Instruments, and what they claim is that 80MHz is applicable bandwidth for A>=2, and 45MHz is applicable for unity gain: Image_alt_text Image_alt_text

I have not yet seen a definition like this, is this considered common practice?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

Convert this post into an update to the original question, please. (1 comment)
+2
−0

You are right in that the gain at 80 MHz is clearly not 100. Both the initial marketing points and the graph seem to agree on a gain⋅bandwidth of 45 MHz.

There does appear to be a slight kink in the gain curve at 800 kHz, but it looks like the gain is a bit below 100 there. A gain of 100 at 800 kHz seems excessive given unity gain at 45 MHz. Maybe they are trying to say the gain falls off faster than 1/f above 800 kHz.

I would certainly ask for clarification from TI before relying on any of these parameters. Or, use a different amp with specs that don't contradict themselves.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

+1
−0

The 1st page of a datasheet is written by marketing. It can still give you an idea of what the chip is about, but it often contains the performance data under the best conditions. The conditions are rarely specified on the 1st page.

Always check the electrical characteristics section and the charts. That’s the engineering information, and the source of truth. If tables & charts don’t agree with the 1st page, then go by tables & charts.

When the 1st page doesn’t fully agree with tables & charts, that’s rarely an engineering error, that’s usually marketing and specsmanship.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »