Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on TIA Frequency Response

Parent

TIA Frequency Response

+3
−2

I am designing a TAI using this tool from Analog devices. The circuit diagram and it's frequency response obtained from the design tool is given below.

Circuit Diagram:

circuit diagram

Frequency Response

frequency response plot

I simulated the same circuit in LTspice the only change I made is instead of dual supply I used single supply.I did not considered photodiode capacitance here.I will be biasing the photodiode as as shown in the first image.

In my circuit I am getting a bandwidth of only 10Hz!!!. Please find my simulation results below.The simulation file is also attached here.

May I know where I went wrong.

LTSpice schematic

LTSpice frequency response

When I kept16nF.The simulation is failing

LTSpice schematic

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+3
−0

The mistake you made seems quite trivial. LTSpice recognizes your 20M as 20mHz (milihertz). If you want 20MHz, then you need to write "20MEG". That's all.

However, when I ran your schm, I got a bandwidth of about 1MHz, which didn't make sense, as I expected a pole at about 430kHz with a 1st-order roll-off. There seems to be some extraneous zero that cancels this pole and it rolls-off with the op-amps parasitic poles (~-40dB roll-off, so 2nd order).

That's as much as I found out. You probably have to characterize the op-amps in LTspice and in Analog's website to see who's wrong. But by the looks of it, I'd tend to trust the Analog's website one.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

2 comment threads

Works for me (1 comment)
Thank you after changing M to Meg I am also getting a BW of 1Mhz.I removed they femto farad feedback ... (2 comments)
Works for me
newbie‭ wrote 1 day ago

I changed M to Meg I am getting a bandwidth of 1M.