Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

TIA Frequency Response

+2
−0

I am designing a TAI using this tool from Analog devices. The circuit diagram and it's frequency response obtained from the design tool is given below.

Circuit Diagram:

Image_alt_text ** Frequency Response**

Image_alt_text

I simulated the same circuit in LTspice the only change I made is instead of dual supply I used single supply.I did not considered photodiode capacitance here.I will be biasing the photodiode as as shown in the first image.

In my circuit I am getting a bandwidth of only 10Hz!!!. Please find my simulation results below.The simulation file is also attached here.

May I know where I went wrong.

Image_alt_text

Image_alt_text

When I kept16nF.The simulation is failing

Image_alt_text

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

1 answer

+1
−0

The labels on your expected frequency response graph and the schematic of what you simulated are too small to see, so I can only answer with general observations.

  1. The Analog Devices schematic shows only 371 fF across the feedback resistor. Specifying such a small capacitance to 3 digits is silly when the inevitable parasitic capacitance could easily be several times that unless you very carefully use unusual construction techniques.

  2. Taking the 371 fF capacitance across 1 MΩ at face value (again, silly), the low pass rolloff frequency is 430 kHz. In reality, it will be less than that because of the real capacitance being higher, but not anywhere as low as 10 Hz.

  3. To get 10 Hz rolloff with 1 MΩ, you'd need 16 nF. That's much larger than stray capacitance, so would need to be deliberate. Again, because the schematic of what you're simulating is too small to read, I can't say what you may have done wrong.

  4. The capacitance of the photodiode doesn't matter because the voltage across it is constant. The cathode is held at 3.3 V, and the anode at 0 V. Since the voltage across the capacitor doesn't change, no current flows thru it, and it becomes irrelevant.

I replaced the schematic with new one with improved readability.

My volunteer time here feels abused due to the initial unreadable schematic, so I'll be brief.

The fact that your simulation is failing means something with the simulation configuration is bad. Try putting in a simple step of 1 µA and see what happens.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

I replaced the schematic with new one with improved readability.If you don't mind could you please ch... (3 comments)

Sign up to answer this question »