Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on Need clarification on SWDIO/SWCLK length‑matching and “shielding” for STM32WBA5MMG debug connector

Post

Need clarification on SWDIO/SWCLK length‑matching and “shielding” for STM32WBA5MMG debug connector

+2
−0

I am using the STM32WBA5MMG module in my design. The reference design is the MB2131 STM32WBA5M M.2 expansion board from ST (schematic), and the external debug connector sheet contains the note:

Specific constraints for SWDIO and SWCLK (must have same length and must be shielded).
[p.5 in the schematic ]

An excerpt of that schematic is attached, showing the STDC14 receiver connector and the SWD signals.

I have two questions:

SWDIO and SWCLK are single‑ended (not a differential pair), so why is explicit length matching between these two signals required on the PCB? Is this just to minimize clock‑to‑data skew at higher SWD clock frequencies, or is there another reason?

The note also says the lines “must be shielded”. Does this simply mean routing SWDIO and SWCLK over a solid ground plane (with a good reference return and maybe some ground stitching vias near the connector), or is a more specific shielding topology implied (e.g., guard traces, ground‑surrounded microstrip, etc.)?

Any guidance on how strictly these constraints need to be followed (for example, acceptable length mismatch on a short board and typical SWD clock speeds) would be appreciated.

schematic snippet of JTAG connector

History

1 comment thread

Quote the applicable sections (4 comments)
Quote the applicable sections
Olin Lathrop‭ wrote 8 months ago

As per what constraints? What shield? You can't expect us to go fish thru two documents to find what you are talking about. Refer to the specific sections, and quote the really pertinent parts in your question.

This should have been obvious. Closing until question is properly written.

newbie‭ wrote 8 months ago

Thanks, I’ve updated the question to include the relevant schematic excerpt and quotes from the documentation

Nick Alexeev‭ wrote 8 months ago

You should also add to the sections and pages, because folks will want to look-up what else is mentioned there. This time I edited the references into your question. Next time take a trouble to add references yourself. It's a good habit.

newbie‭ wrote 8 months ago

Thank you for your time and concern. I will take care of it next time.