Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on Can you call an IC pin 'N.C' if it has hidden functionality?

Parent

Can you call an IC pin 'N.C' if it has hidden functionality?

+5
−0

The particular IC I ran into this issue with was DS3231 RTC. The pin configuration shows: Image alt text

However, the datasheet specifies Image alt text

To my knowledge, 'N.C' appears on ICs when it is decided to use a certain package, but not all pins are needed, or leaving extra pins for future versions. Therefore, is it correct to assign 'N.C' to pins that actually must be tied to ground for the chip to function as intended?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+5
−0

Manufacturers can call their IC pins whatever they like.

NC stands for "No connection", as the datasheet even says. There is nothing wrong with that.

The only questionable part is "Must be connected to ground" for a pin that is not connected to anything. Without further explanation from the manufacturer (did you read the whole datasheet carefully?), we don't know why they say these pins must be connected to ground. It doesn't matter though. They've clearly said what you need to do to stay within spec. They don't owe you a "why" for something as unambiguous as "Must be connected ground".

Perhaps they just don't want the pins to pick up noise, then bring that noise nearer the die. If they explained that, then they'd get the inevitable questions about whether it's really necessary, when you can get away with it or not, etc. Simply stating that they must be connected to ground gets around all that time-wasting.

Perhaps these are actually pins used during manufacturing test. In that case, they are merely presenting them as "no connection", meaning "not something you should ever connect to". As before, there is no upside in providing more detail, so they just say these pins must be connected to ground.

In either case, they have clearly told you what you need to do, and covered their butt so that if you don't follow the requirement, it's on you if the chip gets damaged or doesn't work. Trying to split hairs about what they maybe should have called these pins is pointless.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

2 comment threads

Improper NC designations may give a false sense of security. (1 comment)
General comments (1 comment)
General comments
Nick Alexeev‭ wrote almost 3 years ago · edited almost 3 years ago

In the scheme of things, IC manufacturers don't owe us explanations about N.C. pins. I've seen, however, datasheets which have both N.C. pins and D.N.C. pins. "Not Connected" and "Do Not Connect". N.C. pins weren't connected internally. They were floating. D.N.C. pins were connected internally and used in the factory. The datasheet explained what can and what shalln't be done with the D.N.C. pins.