Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on Change of pins in monostable multivibrator

Post

Change of pins in monostable multivibrator

+1
−1

In monostable multivibrators we use a trigger signal applied to the base of the transistor which is usually off to enter the astable region

Can we instead have a pin which is connected directly to the base of Q1 and when that pin is grounded we will enter to the astable region?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

Clean up the schematic! (4 comments)
Clean up the schematic!
Olin Lathrop‭ wrote over 2 years ago

That schematic is too much of a mess to look at. There are too many unnecessary zig-zags, gratuitous "loopy" corners, and rails that are not straight. Asking others to look at this mess is downright rude. It is like writing two paragraphs in text-speek.

You've had plenty of warnings about sloppiness. This time I'm closing the question until you fix it. Ping me when that's done, so that I can re-open it.

MissMulan‭ wrote over 2 years ago

@Olin i dont think it is possible in Multisim NOT to make any zig-zag .

MissMulan‭ wrote over 2 years ago

@Olin Done!It has been fixed

Olin Lathrop‭ wrote over 2 years ago

That's much better, and I wouldn't have closed it in its current state. However, since we're here, fix it the rest of the way. The junction dot to the right of C1 and below R4 is missing, V1 could be centered better, etc. Show me an example of neatness and attention to detail! Actually try to make it as nice and readable as you can. Of course that is what you should have been doing all along anyway.