Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on How to protect RF switches from ESD?

Parent

How to protect RF switches from ESD?

+6
−1

Assume that I have some generic antenna connector, followed by a pi-filter/50ohm impedance matching components, then a DC blocking cap (as per the RF switch recommendations) and then a RF switch for split tx/rx semiduplex transceiver, as in this schematic:

antenna schematic

How do I best protect this RF switch from ESD coming in from human fingers touching the antenna connector? I need the highest ESD class (4) of the IEC61000−4−2, meaning 8kV contact discharge, 15kV air discharge.

I'm considering a specialized "ultra-low capacitance" TVS diode such as ESD8472 (rated up to 20kV), which is bidirectional.

Questions:

  • Is this TVS diode the way to go?
  • If so, where do I place it in this schematic? Directly on the antenna or somewhere else?
  • How to determine the suitable breakdown voltage? I'm assuming it should be based on the RF switch supply which is 3.3V.
History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

2 comment threads

Hello Lundin. I think it would help if you can specify what is the general configuration of your syst... (2 comments)
Are you going for the formal IEC 61000−4−2 certification test? Sometimes passing a test it a harder ... (2 comments)
Post
+5
−1

Somewhat a pity to throw money for an expensive ultra-low capacitance TVS.

You have not specified what is the frequency range of your antenna system, but since you say you have to protect it from human fingers, it is likely to be a small antenna in the gigahertz range.

So, all what you need is a small, small, choke between C3 and S1, connected to ground via a stupid TVS, or even without TVS at all (since the the DC voltage between C3 and S1 is most probably at ground). Totally inexpensive.

TVS-with-choke

Of course, you choose the inductor value to block 95% (say) of the lowest frequency in the given range and no more, which means a very small inductance at these frequencies. ESD discharges are much slower (in the MHz range at the worst), and after they have passed the pi filter, they will probably come much likely in the 100KHz range maximum. So, they will discharge to ground via the TVS, and hardly feel the small choke.

Note: many antennas, like the Vivaldi antenna or the self grounded bow tie antenna are made of a single block where the ground part is connected to the feeding part:

Vivaldi antenna

For those antennas, I believe it is pointless to protect the receiver from ESD.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

2 comment threads

[downvote comment] Frequency content of ESD discharges (2 comments)
Antenna (2 comments)
[downvote comment] Frequency content of ESD discharges
Nick Alexeev‭ wrote over 1 year ago

[downvote comment] I don't agree that "ESD discharges are much slower (in the MHz range at the worst)". ESD discharges have frequency content that extends into 100s of MHz. The frequency content comes from the 1ns raise time at the front of the ESD discharge. This is mentioned in a lot of app notes on ESD. For example, have a look at the NXP app note AN11267 p. 11 .

coquelicot‭ wrote about 1 year ago

Well, for me "100s of MHz" is already called "MHz range". The antenna I am dealing with in the thread are usually operated well in the GHz range. Also, pay attention that 1ns rise time gives something like 300-500MHz frequency content if I'm not wrong (use a convertor to obtain the precise value).