Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on Current and voltage of inductor

Parent

Current and voltage of inductor

+0
−3

How do I find the current through the inductor and the voltage of the inductor after the switch is closed?

hi

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

2 comment threads

The circuit is wrong. (3 comments)
Use designators already! (2 comments)
Post
+1
−0

For reference, here is your circuit properly drawn with component designators:

The question is what happens when the inductor current starts at 0, then the switch is closed.

The first observation should be that the current source and the two resistors can be reduced to the equivalent Norton or Thevenin circuits. That is a current source with a single resistor in parallel, or a voltage source with a single resistor in series. The two are equivalent from the inductor's point of view. I'll pick the Thevenin version:

The current function should now be obvious from inspection because it's a simple L-R decay:

    I = Ifinal⋅(1 - e-t/Τ)

    I = (V1/R3)⋅(1 - e-t(R3/L1))

We can easily see that:

  • The initial current is 0.
  • The "final" current is V1/R3 = (5 V)/(15 Ω) = 333 mA.
  • The time constant is L1/R3 = (1 H)/(15 Ω) = 66.7 ms.

the time costant is L1/R so the t/T must have units of Ohms*seconds/Henries

I'm not sure what you are getting at. Resistance divided by inductance yields units of time. Specifically, Henrys / Ohms = seconds.

Ah, I just noticed that I accidentally flipped the time constant in the equation above. The exponential is supposed to be e-t/Τ, with Τ being L1/R3. I'll go fix that now.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

2 comment threads

The original circuit is wrong. (3 comments)
Olin maybe you may want to delete this post. (3 comments)
The original circuit is wrong.
JRN‭ wrote about 3 years ago

I mentioned in a comment under the posted question that the 1-A current source cannot be connected in series with an open switch. I proposed a way to correct the circuit, but the OP doesn't seem to understand that the original circuit is wrong. Could you perhaps edit your answer to note this? Thanks.

Olin Lathrop‭ wrote about 3 years ago

While you are technically correct, I think you're also being pedantic in this case. Given that there is no such thing as an ideal current source in reality, it seems clear enough that the switch and current source together are meant to be an open when the switch is open, and producing a fixed current when the switch is closed. That would be the behavior of a real current source with a series switch, assuming the switch can block the maximum voltage the current source can make.

In a different context, I might agree with you, like on homework or an exam question. If this came up in reality, I'd check that the switch can take the max voltage, and consider what effect the transient would have on the current source and the external circuit.

JRN‭ wrote about 3 years ago

Okay. The OP seems to be a student, but I have no problem with your response.