Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on Complex frequency of a pole

Parent

Complex frequency of a pole

+0
−0

If we have the transfer function of a LC high pass filter:

$H(s) = \frac{sL}{sL+\frac{1}{sC}}$

If we want to find the pole of that filter in the end we get:

$s = \frac{j}{\sqrt{LC}}$

and for a sinuisodal input signal $s = j\omega$ the pole exists at the resonant frequency $\omega_{r}$

However if we dont apply a sinuisodal signal at the input s may become a complex number->the frequency of the pole may be complex.But what physical meaning does it have?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+1
−0

Your question doesn't make a lot of sense.

for a sinusoidal input signal s = jω the pole exists at the resonant frequency ωr.

Actually the pole exists regardless of what the input signal is. The transfer function is a description of what happens with any* input signal.

However if we don't apply a sinusoidal signal at the input s may become a complex number->the frequency of the pole may be complex.

This is the same misconception. The pole is part of the system. It is always there. It has nothing to do with what input might be thrown at that system. The pole doesn't change as a function of the input. The only thing that changes as a function of the input signal is the output signal.


* Any real world signal. Technically, any analytic signal, which means that it is infinitely differentiable. That in turn means the signal or any of its derivatives can't jump instantly. Real world signal always have some finite bandwidth, so can't jump instantly. Such real world signals can then be decomposed into a set of sines. Since we're talking about linear systems, contributions from multiple superimposed input signals can be analyzed separately and their results added to determine the output signal. Therefore, an input signal can be decomposed into a sum of sines, the result of each sine computed separately, then those results added to find the overall output signal. (Credit to user LvW for pointing out "any" should be qualified).

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

2 comment threads

Quote: "The transfer function is a description of what happens with any input signal." What is the ... (5 comments)
General Comments (6 comments)
Quote: "The transfer function is a description of what happens with any input signal." What is the ...
LvW‭ wrote over 2 years ago

Quote: "The transfer function is a description of what happens with any input signal." What is the meaning of "any input signal"? To avoid misunderstandings it should be clear that the transfer function is defined for sinusoidal signals only!

Olin Lathrop‭ wrote over 2 years ago

OK, "any" was too broad. "Any real-world" function would be better, since those can be decomposed to a set of sines. Since the system is linear, each sine component of the input can be treated independently.

MissMulan‭ wrote over 2 years ago

@LvW "the transfer function is defined for sinusoidal signals only!" why is that true?Why isnt the transfer function applied for a rectangular signal?Just s will be equal to something else instead of jω then.

Canina‭ wrote over 2 years ago

MissMulan‭ There is no such thing as square waves in the physical world. A "square" wave is just a number of superimposed sine waves.

LvW‭ wrote over 2 years ago

@ MissMulan You were asking "why is that true" that the transfer function is defined for sinusoidal signals only. I think, definitions cannot be "true" or "false" - definitions are arbitrary determinations which are logical and make sense. The transfer function T(s) of a system is derived from its frequency response A(jw) by replacing jw by s=sigma+jw. And remember: The angular frequency w=2Pi*f is defined for sinusoudal signals only.