Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »

Activity for Lundin‭

Type On... Excerpt Status Date
Comment Post #283240 There's cases where I've hired a professional translator to translate some manual to English, but even them came back and asked about how to translate technical details, because in order to correctly translate specific technical terms, you need domain knowledge. Sure there are specialized technical d...
(more)
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #283240 As I wrote in the question "these terms are far too technical to find in a dictionary". The capacitor example was just a funny anecdote, a capacitor it's a well-known component and probably even taught in science classes in high school. But terms like the "cable tray" are highly specialized. Another ...
(more)
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #283239 Post edited:
over 2 years ago
Edit Post #283239 Initial revision over 2 years ago
Question Is English translation of technical terms on-topic?
Quite often, I find myself knowing the technical term of an electronic component in my native language, but not the proper English term. For example when translating a manual or other technical documentation to English, since these terms are far too technical to find in a dictionary. In such situa...
(more)
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #282746 Here on the Internet ALL CAPS is considered shouting here and therefore rude. You should stop doing that if you plan to keep using the Internet.
(more)
almost 3 years ago
Comment Post #282729 Covering lamps with aluminium plate isn't Electrical Engineering. Kindly check what's on-topic at a site before you post. https://electrical.codidact.com/help/topics
(more)
almost 3 years ago
Comment Post #282543 Ah yeah, that might actually be why I had a gut reaction to lower the resistance. Now I recall making that very error too on an old LM317, drawing too little current through the resistors, after which the output voltage went bad.
(more)
almost 3 years ago
Comment Post #282543 For some LDOs this is the case, but I can't tell if it matters for this one. At any rate you'll want to avoid oddball resistor values in your BoM, for better availability and reduced price.
(more)
almost 3 years ago
Comment Post #282543 I haven't used this particular part, but generally you'll want the adjust resistors to be fairly low. You can probably divide them by 5 to 10 something. Also, tinker around with the formula until you find two values that are close to standard series values. 500R and 4k7 for example would be fairly cl...
(more)
almost 3 years ago
Comment Post #282152 You could also write self-answered Q&A which is perfectly fine too, encouraged even. Example: [Driving relay, transistor keeps failing](https://electrical.codidact.com/posts/276116). This are typically about one single, specific issue. And it can be targeted towards any knowledge level - you could wr...
(more)
almost 3 years ago
Comment Post #281971 @coquelicot‭ It's not complicated at all assuming you got the stuff already :) Though a high quality directional coupler costs a bit. Tracking generators are very easy to use, just attach two coax to input & output on the spec, then click on the button that says tracking generator, and that's pretty ...
(more)
almost 3 years ago
Comment Post #282139 Also keep the reverse voltage in mind. 60V is too much for standard Schottky. Though shouldn't the coil voltage ideally get converted down close to 12V with a step-down? I haven't worked much with bigger contactors, but plain relay coils don't work reliably at all if you stray too far from their nomi...
(more)
almost 3 years ago
Comment Post #282053 @Olin Lathrop‭ So essentially the box would have to become a "mini EMC lab" :) Though large enough to not be in the near field, so not so "mini" any longer either. Maybe the easiest solution here might actually be to do the measurement outdoors in the open.
(more)
almost 3 years ago
Comment Post #282053 One crazy idea I have: what if I mount the antenna inside a large metal box? So it is grounded but inside a Faraday cage. Then the environment would be the same and no reflections from walls or people.
(more)
almost 3 years ago
Edit Post #281971 Post edited:
almost 3 years ago
Comment Post #281974 Yeah maybe nearby walls could be an issue. When I did this I had the antenna mounted vertically against a metal plate surface approx 300x300mm but the fixture was placed around 1-2 meters from a wall. Consisting of plaster, not reinforced concrete, but still. Maybe if I use one that's 1x1m and keep i...
(more)
almost 3 years ago
Comment Post #281971 @Andy aka‭ The purpose here is to measure pre-made antennas from various manufacturers to see if they can be used for the specific frequency. Still, if EMI is the cause, then moving the fundamental to some quiet band won't be reliable either, because I'd still get harmonics from TV/radio broadcasts e...
(more)
almost 3 years ago
Edit Post #281971 Initial revision almost 3 years ago
Question Is there a way to reliably measure antenna return loss outside a lab?
Assume I'm a complete beginner at RF. Is there a way to measure return loss of an antenna, in such a manner that I can reliably reproduce the measurement later on? What I'm talking about is producing the antenna characteristic graph to show what frequency it was adapted to and how wide it is. ...
(more)
almost 3 years ago
Comment Post #281247 The aim of this site is surely to be newbie-friendly to _electrical engineering newbies_ not to _general electronics newbies_. That means we should welcome engineering students or fresh out of school EE to ask questions here. If such users feel unwelcome, we are doing it wrong. If some John Doe who i...
(more)
almost 3 years ago
Comment Post #281540 @coquelicot‭ It means buying from component traders instead of the usual well-known vendors. There is a huge market of people buying and selling electronic components similar to stock trading. It's the last resort where you go when you can't buy obsolete parts from a trusted source. And it is filled ...
(more)
about 3 years ago
Comment Post #281540 What makes you think it is fake in the first place? Did you buy it from the spot market?
(more)
about 3 years ago
Comment Post #281444 Except it's not wands they are waving, it is 1/2 wave antennas!
(more)
about 3 years ago
Edit Post #281437 Post edited:
about 3 years ago
Suggested Edit Post #281437 Suggested edit:

(more)
helpful about 3 years ago
Comment Post #281437 I'm hardly an expert on antennas, just wondering how these hobbyist modules went from hobbyist status to reference design status... Here's an interesting article on the topic though: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijap/2018/5172960/
(more)
about 3 years ago
Comment Post #281437 What makes you think that antenna _is_ properly designed though? I hear nothing but bad things about these ESP32 modules. Anyway, you want an antenna to radiate, but your don't want regular traces to radiate.
(more)
about 3 years ago
Edit Post #281361 Post edited:
Added some suitable tags
about 3 years ago
Suggested Edit Post #281361 Suggested edit:
Added some suitable tags
(more)
helpful about 3 years ago
Comment Post #281246 Nobody dismissed anyone...? The question sits at 5 up-votes, 0 down-votes. I'd be curious to learn the reason too but nobody seems to know.
(more)
about 3 years ago
Edit Post #281289 Post edited:
Removed some irrelevant tags. Added "reverse engineering".
about 3 years ago
Suggested Edit Post #281289 Suggested edit:
Removed some irrelevant tags. Added "reverse engineering".
(more)
helpful about 3 years ago
Comment Post #281289 It's common that automotive MCUs come with custom markings. So that might not be a part number at all, only some program version. Any semiconductor company logo on them? Could also be a custom SoC or FPGA.
(more)
about 3 years ago
Edit Post #281249 Post edited:
about 3 years ago
Comment Post #281246 Li/Ion and LiPo are generally around 3.8 - 4V somewhere though, at least modern ones. And I think 3.3V goes back to the early 1990s somewhere, it probably pre-dates such batteries. So this doesn't explain where 3.3V comes from, specifically. I think this rather has to do with CPU core voltages and CP...
(more)
about 3 years ago
Suggested Edit Post #281249 Suggested edit:

(more)
helpful about 3 years ago
Edit Post #281251 Initial revision about 3 years ago
Answer A: Is there a tool or trick for bending TO220 leads
There's lots of specialized tools for various through-hole components overall, all of them generally called "lead benders". For TO-220 it appears that the term is lead bending/forming pliers. And there exist lots of different versions, depending on how you want the legs to go. This site (I'm not ...
(more)
about 3 years ago
Comment Post #281249 Why would you bend them in the direction of that picture though? Are you using heatsink?
(more)
about 3 years ago
Comment Post #281165 In this case it is LoRa, which is supposed to use spread spectrum to compensate for high output power, so I don't get why the harmonics are that prominent. It's max 14dBm carrier if I remember correctly.
(more)
about 3 years ago
Comment Post #281165 Just curious since my experience (I'm definitely not a RF designer) is that PI filters are mostly used for general EMC, like when you need to block emissions over a very broad frequency range. But harmonics are specific and you know where they will be at, so why not just get rid of them.
(more)
about 3 years ago
Comment Post #281165 What's the reason you'd pick a PI low pass over a Chebyshev one? I thought Chebyshev were ideal since they give a much steeper dip after carrier?
(more)
about 3 years ago
Comment Post #281144 In my opinion you can't really solder 0603 or smaller with the standard tips, nor fine pitch QFP, QFN etc. I always use a small tip for most things SMD.
(more)
about 3 years ago
Comment Post #281066 @coquelicot‭ You need to go some 30-40 dgr C higher for RoHS solder. However, if you have the possibility to set the temperature manually, you put it much higher than the melting point anyway, which is the temperature that affects the tip life. Leaded melts around 180, RoHS around 220 and I put the i...
(more)
about 3 years ago
Comment Post #281083 Your 6th harmonic are over the spurious emission limits on a LoRa? That sounds strange, did you deviate a lot from reference designs? How many dBm are the harmonics at and what's your carrier output power?
(more)
about 3 years ago
Comment Post #281083 I guess question #1 here is: is this a simplex or duplex radio? Any antenna switches etc present?
(more)
about 3 years ago
Comment Post #281070 @Mu3 I think the debacle ended when LT merged with AD. There's no such database of part markings AFAIK, though some manufacturers provide a cross ref service on their site. In practice this is about asking a veteran EE - "I need a buck/boost part, who should I check with?". Or you can ask this of an ...
(more)
about 3 years ago
Edit Post #281070 Initial revision about 3 years ago
Answer A: Why do DC/DC switching controllers seem to favour the buck-boost topology over similar ones like Cuk, SEPIC and Zeta?
I'm not sure there's a technical reason, except usually the offered parts are multi-topology and then they could be listed as buck-boost while they at the same time could as well be used as flyback, SEPIC etc. This seems to be the case for TI and Maxim, which at a glance seem to call everything "...
(more)
about 3 years ago